The Heritage Foundation, which predicted that the 2001 Bush tax cuts would bring on an economic boom, increase household income and reduce federal debt:
-snip-
Modest recent growth in typical household's income has not been enough to reverse a seven-year decline
-snip-
In 2000, the year before those tax cuts, the federal government took in $1.31 trillion dollars in taxes. In 2001, with those tax cuts for part of the year, the total was $1.25 trillion in taxes. After the tax cuts: 2002, $1.073 trillion. 2003, $1.070 trillion. 2004, $1.153 trillion. 2005, $1.383 trillion. It took three full years to reach the same level of revenue from before the tax cuts when that revenue should, with inflation, have been considerably higher. The cost of extending those tax cuts in reduced federal revenue: $2.8 trillion over the next ten years, all of which adds to the debt because we are in deficit spending.
-Snip-
2000, the year before the tax cuts, GDP growth was 4.1%. 2000, it was 5%. 2002, the year after the tax cuts: .3%. 2003, 2.45%. So much for the theory that lowering the tax rates would "significantly increase economic growth."
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2011/04/the_nostradamus_award_goes_to.php#more ..and the GOP clowns rely on the Heritage analysis to support Ryan's joke of a budget.....:banghead: