Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great quote from Roger Ebert's review of Atlas Shrugged: ""I’m on board; pull up the lifeline."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:02 AM
Original message
Great quote from Roger Ebert's review of Atlas Shrugged: ""I’m on board; pull up the lifeline."
Edited on Fri Apr-15-11 12:04 AM by white_wolf
That was his description of Objectvisim. Oh, and here is a quote about the movie itself: "And now I am faced with this movie, the most anticlimactic non-event since Geraldo Rivera broke into Al Capone’s vault." Oh and here is the link to the review: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110414/REVIEWS/110419990
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Paradoxical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. I got 10 pages into the book and had to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You undoubtedly get the "paradox" that the RWers refuse to see
I just "love" how all these so-called RW "Christians" throw out the "do unto others...." for the "I've got mine, F__k you!" in true Ayn Randian fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not to mention she was a hardcore atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. You know what drove me crazy about that book?
Edited on Fri Apr-15-11 12:34 AM by Marr
Her reasoning is so glaringly flawed. This is basically her argument for proving her surprising claim that altruism is evil:

'Begin with the assumption that altruism is evil. Therefore, altruism is evil'.

Then she says that humanity has been living unnaturally since the beginnings of society, and nature demands the individual look out only for themselves. She says that any organism that does not follow this truism would soon go extinct. But HERE WE FUCKING ARE, not going extinct. If you accept her first claim, the second makes no sense. She must've been high all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. And so, an infant abandoned at birth, never enjoying the mother's breast or care
will, of course, survive to be a titan of industry -- in Ayn Rand's imaginary world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. I read everything I could find by Ayn Rand. Fortunately, I outgrew her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. So did I
Read a ton of her stuff after seeing her on the Tom Snyder show more than 30 years ago. I was at first intrigued, then skeptical, then revolted. Read all of The Fountainhead, which I found to be a mediocre potboiler based on a somewhat intriguing premise, and a bunch of the smaller works. "On the Virtue of Selfishness" nearly turned my stomach and I only managed to get through 300 or so of the atrociously typed (one can hardly call it "written") Fatlas Sharted (tip o' the hat to DUer HughBeaumont for that gem) before flinging aside with great force. That has to be one of the ten worst books in the history of printing.

Ayn Rand was a walking moral abomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. one of the ten worst books in the history of printing.
lol you rock! Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Thanks, but I am not a newbie
Been here under various monikers since '05. Lost passwords, defunct e-mail addresses cost me my first 5K+ posts but I am back to stay. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themadstork Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. I read the whole goddam thing.
One of the worst experiences of my life. Sad that her ideology has elevated such a horrific writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ahh, bless Roger Ebert. He's a national treasure...
:cheers: to your continued recovery and health, Mr. Ebert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. I've read nothing but scathing reviews so far.
And the director has cast himself as John Galt. :eyes:

This movie will hopefully sound the death knell for Randism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. That review was priceless.
"Frequently throughout the film, characters repeat the phrase, "Who is John Galt?" Well they might ask. A man in black, always shot in shadow, is apparently John Galt. If you want to get a good look at him and find out why everybody is asking, I hope you can find out in Part 2. I don’t think you can hold out for Part 3."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't forget this gem
"Oh, and there is Wisconsin. Dagny and Hank ride blissfully in Taggart’s new high-speed train, and then Hank suggests they take a trip to Wisconsin, where the state’s policies caused the suppression of an engine that runs on the ozone in the air, or something (the film’s detailed explanation won’t clear this up). They decide to drive there. That’s when you’ll enjoy the beautiful landscape photography of the deserts of Wisconsin. My advice to the filmmakers: If you want to use a desert, why not just refer to Wisconsin as "New Mexico"?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Ah, the Wisconsin deserts...
I remember when my parents used to take me to them... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. Don't forget the palm trees at the one desert oasis n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. There is so much I could say, but I won't....
There is someone who might read this, and that person will know exactly what I mean...

Hi Steve! lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. The moral of the story: invest in high-speed rail!
Um... or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. and don't forget this gratuitous little snap....hilarious!!!
"There is also a love scene, which is shown not merely from the waist up but from the ears up. The man keeps his shirt on. This may be disappointing for libertarians, who I believe enjoy rumpy-pumpy as much as anyone."

Gosh, I love Roger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hard to turn a crappy book into a good movie.
Can't think of one example, actually.

Lots of examples of the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zanzoobar Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Forrest Gump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yep, good one.
Was the book crappy? I know quite a bit was changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zanzoobar Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Ya gotta read it.
If I remember correctly, he was fired into space with a monkey and some other subjects. I think they landed back on earth and didn't know where they were. Yes, like Planet of the Apes.

I remember I thought the book wasn't worth the time I wasted on it and was pretty surprised when the movie came out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. The movie would have been a wash without Tom Hanks, IMO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Newt Gingrich said it was his favorite movie...
look closely............all of the left leaning characters are selfish and shallow, while the right-leaning characters are those of high integrity and stout moral fiber...

the leader of the anti-war hippies, for example, espouses peace but is wretchedly violent toward his (Forrest') girlfriend.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. I'll disagree
It's generally anti-war and sympathetic to the plight of an AIDS victim. IMO mostly neutral.

Don't make me agree with Newt on anything besides this movie and global warming, or it will provoke a gag reflex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themadstork Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. The shining
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. Lady From Shanghi
Orson Wells said he'd turn into movie before reading it. Book sucks, great movie even after studio edit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. According to rottentomatoes.com
with thirteen reviews in, it's batting a perfect 0%.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/atlas_shrugged_part_i

Some excerpts...

Don't hold your breath for parts 2 and 3. - Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal

A low-budget film with more than a whiff of amateurism in its writing and direction. - Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

Sitting through this picture is like watching early rehearsals of a stage play that's clearly doomed. - Kurt Loder, Reason Online

Atlas Shrugged. I arched eyebrow, scrunched forehead, yawned. - Carrie Rickey, Philadelphia Inquirer

About to lose his long-held rights to Ayn Rand's novel, and perhaps to cash in on apparent Tea Party interest and support, producer John Aglialoro ... rushed this film into a low-budget production and it shows in every frame. - Loren King, Boston Globe

The acting is so poor and the story so badly told that the viewer's feelings about Rand's novel -- an epic ode to free-market fundamentalism -- are almost immaterial (though if you're a devoted fan, you'll perhaps be more forgiving). - Bill Goodykoontz, Arizona Republic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. LOL
Atlas Shrugged. I arched eyebrow, scrunched forehead, yawned. - Carrie Rickey, Philadelphia Inquirer

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. LOL, badass review!
:thumbsup:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Did the Koch Brothers front the production of this ode to psychopaths in business suits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. Aynal-retentive people
Boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. That's very good.
Aynal-retentive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. Lol, not one positive review from the critics on Rotten Tomatoes!
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/atlas_shrugged_part_i/

Though the Freepers have been hitting it hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themadstork Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-11 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. One of the commenters on one of the reviews a few days ago
said he preferred AS over Moby Dick and Huckleberry Finn. At first I thought he was joking. And then I wept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC