|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 08:57 PM Original message |
Why do fundamentalist Christians prefer the King James Bible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. They think God dictated it to King James |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. Don't know. Don't care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Dunno...but...why do I prefer the Mr. Magoo version of "A Christmas Carol?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because it's so archaic they can't really figure out what it means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terra Alta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. I often wonder about that, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
6. Deleted message |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well first that's not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. It sounds more "official" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. It was good enough for Jesus, so it's good enough for us! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonAnn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You beat me to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. Love it ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
42. One of our Texas Governors said that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. A lie that continues to be spread by atheists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
P. Galore (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I heard the story from Ann Richards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belpejic (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 11:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
52. I used to be fluent in Olde English as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. They don't and the vast majority prefer the New International Version |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Jevoha's Witnesses have their own translatoin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Wrong place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. It is called KIT, The Kingdom Interlinear Translation, but will accept KJV when pressed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Actually, the KJV is considered Jacobean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. But correct...my mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't know that they do, but most educated people prefer it for the poetry of language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. +1,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
37. I dunno . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. The King James Only movement has a few different currents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. It is amusing the the Book of Mormon is in part "written" like KJV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Yeah, I've heard some Mormons say Smith translated it like that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Most agree it was plagiarized except for the true believers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. And which group would this be? Because I find it hard to credit this comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. I know I've read that before, but I can't find it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. They don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. Hell... The Way They Tend To Prefer Extreme Judgement And Punishment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. "wouldn't that mean" what? There really is no such thing as an "Old Testament Christian," that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #24 |
40. You Are So Close... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack_ (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
23. Cause they like to call penises |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
32. You mean like when Paul keeps saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. Maybe it's more blatant in its glorification of murder, racism and genocide? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Even a "Doofus" can spot bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
33. Not all are like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anneboleyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
34. It was produced in 1604 by some of the leading Protestant reformers in England |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I though the KJV came out in 1611? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anneboleyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
49. It was worked on over a period of seven years, 1604-1611. So it was started in 1604. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
35. It still has old english style wording and phrasing, for example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
38. They don't. Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
39. If the King James was good enough for Jesus it's good enough for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcboon (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. Not all of them do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
43. Because a god told King James to be gay and to commission the bible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anneboleyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. Yes on the first point, something they don't like to discuss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm not a fundie, & I prefer the KJV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
45. When I took religion classes in college |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
47. If it was good enough for Jesus its good enough for ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
50. Because it is the only "true word of God" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-16-11 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
53. There's a lot of flip answers here, but as an ex-fundie who was part of one of those churches... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC