Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

shizzam!!! Pentagon Inquiry Into Article Clears McChrystal and Aides

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 02:56 PM
Original message
shizzam!!! Pentagon Inquiry Into Article Clears McChrystal and Aides
WASHINGTON — An inquiry by the Defense Department inspector general into a magazine profile that resulted in the abrupt, forced retirement of Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal has cleared the general, his military aides and civilian advisers of all wrongdoing.

Pentagon investigators said they were unable to confirm the events as reported in the June 2010 article in Rolling Stone, and the inquiry’s final review challenged the accuracy of the profile of General McChrystal, who was the top commander in Afghanistan.

The article, headlined “The Runaway General,” quoted people identified as senior aides to the general making disparaging statements about members of President Obama’s national security team.

The profile prompted a furious debate about whether the commander’s staff had used insubordinate language in discussing the nation’s civilian leadership, and whether General McChrystal had tolerated or even fostered such a climate of disrespect on his team.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/19/us/politics/19military.html?hp=&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. drizzle drazzle druzzle drone -- you're all clear -- now go home! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it didn't happen why did McChrystal not deny it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why would Generals exonerate Generals?
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. like expecting pfizer to come in with a bad report on viagra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. At least when Arnold investigated his own sexual harrassment
he used both hands. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is laughable...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. LOL! I feel so much better now!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. McChrystal's plan for Afghanistan blew up in his face ...
..., And the President's face, and the whole country's face. There is a news story for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. How convenient.
Why now? Why does the word "whitewash" come to mind?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. well that settles that
meanwhile fuck mccrystal for what he did to the Tilman family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Typical. Whistleblowing private gets jailed and tortured. Coverup general gets retired.
"..and justice for all."

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. you would think in a just society that the truth would be honored.....naaaaaaaaaw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Poor Rolling Stone
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Rolling Stone editors respond:
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 04:13 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/rolling-stone-statement-on-the-pentagons-mcchrystal-report-20110418

Rolling Stone Statement on the Pentagon's McChrystal Report


The Pentagon’s inspector general today released the results of its investigation into “The Runaway General,” the Rolling Stone profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal that forced his resignation last June. The magazine issued the following response to the report:

The report by the Pentagon’s inspector general offers no credible source – or indeed, any named source – contradicting the facts as reported in our story, “The Runaway General.” Much of the report, in fact, confirms our reporting, noting only that the Pentagon was unable to find witnesses “who acknowledged making or hearing the comments as reported.” This is not surprising, given that the civilian and military advisors questioned by the Pentagon knew that their careers were on the line if they admitted to making such comments. Asking unnamed sources to reveal their identities strikes us as an exercise in futility. Rolling Stone stands by our story, which is accurate in every detail. We also note that Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s own response to the story was to issue an apology, saying that what was reflected in the article fell “far short” of his personal standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. whitewash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. So are they going to un-retire him now?
Since it was all a big mistake and he is so totally innocent?
Seems they would want to do that, wouldn't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Den of Foxes Investigation Into Chicken Disappearances From Hen House Clears Fox
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. couldn't take a new job with the administration... with that "cloud"
hanging over his head....now...he can see clearly now the cloud is gone....poof...it was all a lie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC