|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:38 PM Original message |
The Senate was going to kick Ensign out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. I've heard a couple of possible explanations -- hadn't heard that one (which I like) - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nope! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Not accord to Ralston |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Love it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. gotta resign befor the benefits get taken away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. Plus, by resigning, the results of the Ethics Comm. investigation will just be filed away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That's a big part of this but Lawrence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Rachel is discussing this now n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. Not really, but the hearings would have been PUBLIC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC