Wingnut tells me Quitter is SO over with them, only us Dems are obsessed with her

[UTUSN]

I had posted here but also in an e-mail to this local wingnut about Franklin GRAHAM dismissing Quitter. And he replied mockingly, that only some of us Dems are still obsessed with her. So I said to him:

Re, your: “The only people who still think SPalin is a factor are certain reporters and, ahem, certain Democrats. she's so over.”

Well, when I posted that Franklin GRAHAM had thrown her under the bus, I added that her downward trajectory with Rethugs is getting to be a LITTLE OLD NEWS, but still newsy enough.

You might mock us Dems for nails-on-blackboard nerves at ANY of your Rethug possibilities, whether they have a chance or not. It’s NOT like I/WE ever would think she was suitable for anything except cheerleading/beauty-pageants, but Rethugs DID, at one time, BET on her (think Billy “William” KRISTOL, who started her hype).

Get what I mean? Y’all gave her SOMETHING of credence, whether as a wildcard bet or as actually believing in her. If she had proved docile to “advisers” (read, string-pullers like Shrub’s), y’all would have been totally happy to install her. It’s NERVES on our Dem part because if Shrub can be installed ANYBODY (except intelligent, idealistic, conscientious Dems) CAN be. We laughed off RAYGUN, ‘member? So you have us on edge all the time because y’all are nutso enough to do ANYTHING for whatever crackpot comes down the pike, like installing TRUMP.

Rethugs are gearing up to go gaga for the Fascist-type-of-Cuban (NOT ALL Cubans) a-hole, Marco RUBIO. Oh, joy. But first he might have to wait in line for BACHMANN or whatever other Martian y’all can kick through the rabbit hole.

Repeating, “(PALIN) is so over” for YOU, but YOU (not we) gave her SOME credence: WE never did.

So he replies below, still giving Quitter credit ---BEFORE "her checkered life was investigated". I'm answering, Don't give yourself so much credit. I knew she was scum ON SIGHT, the same as I knew Shrub's Iraq Attack was a phony war. Plus, you are still crediting her with "beliefs" and "views." She's a talking parrot.


*************QUOTE, the Wingnut's REPLY********

You never did because she was saying things the total opposite of what you all believe. That was before her checkered life was investigated or before she resigned and dropped out. She was derided because her views are the contrary of the Democratic Party's.

Republicans would have voted from someone bleeding from the ears wearing Depends rather than vote for Obama and they would have been right. On the other hand, Obama IS the new Jimmy Carter. Today's IMF story has put 'Paid' to the O admin. He won't be re-elected. Until this morning I had assumed he would be.

**********UNQUOTE**********

[rfranklin]

1. Wishful thinking...

They are going to have to moean an piss for another four years after 2012.

[Thunderstruck]

2. What IMF story?