may be exposed before and after the 2024 election by transiting Saturn conjunct his secondary progressed Mars.

Birth time not known, noon used and chart located to the Capitol Building in Washington, DC.

Jared Kushner - Natal Relocated Jan 10 1981, 12:00 pm, EST +5:00
Capitol Building Dist of Columbia, 38°N53'24'', 077°W00'34''
Geocentric Tropical Zodiac

Mar 23 2024 Sat 12°Pi36' Cnj Mar 12°Pi36' Tr-Sp
Oct 25 2024 Sat 13°Pi04' Cnj Mar 13°Pi04' Tr-Sp
Dec 8 2024 Sat 13°Pi10' Cnj Mar 13°Pi10' Tr-Sp

March 25 2024 lunar eclipse 5°07' Libra.

March 25 2024 Sibly prog New Moon at 19°26' Pices.

Chart for VP Harris prog to 2024 election in the White House



Years ago, when I was developing my progressed lunar return technique using charts for natural disasters (because the event details were so accurately recorded) I found that many times [but not always] an event chart would have an eclipse from the previous year right on or in hard square to one of the chart's angles.

On March 25, 2024, the USA's Sibly chart will have progressed to a New Moon on the same day as a lunar eclipse [Full Moon] at 5°07' Libra marking that eclipse degree as one of possible importance for the nation. That eclipse degree falls exactly on the East Point [an exact square in true body position in space right ascension to the MC] of vice president Harris' secondary progressed chart [at 5°22' Libra], located to the White House, to election day. The country's chart by virtue of it's progressed New Moon falling on the same day as an eclipse and that eclipse squaring the MC of the VP's progressed chart on election day denote them in particular unlike the president and first lady's charts. New Moon - beginning of a cycle; Full Moon - ending of a cycle.

What is a mystery is the very positive aspect of the Sibly chart on the MC of VP Harris progressed chart at the exact same time as a very negative aspect in the Sibly chart on her progressed chart's ASC. Could it be she becomes POTUS under negative circumstances?

on or around election day 2024 or could she and the Bidens (pres and wife) encounter violence together then?

Any opinions based on astrology?

The inauguration chart showing the DESC and Moon positions in longitude show the Moon is past setting but the true body (right ascension) positions of those 2 in space show that the Moon will not attain the DESC until the MC reaches almost 2 degrees more [about 8 minutes in clock time] meaning the Moon is above the Desc at the time of the inauguration [12 pm, EST].

Inaugural Moons through 2009.



Since then:

The inaugural Moon test for party change held true for the 2013 inauguration when the inaugural RAMC was at 298°12′ and the Moon rose at 301°54′ (Moon below – no change).

And for the 2017 inauguration when it appeared not to work as the Moon in longitude was shown below the DESC when in reality the actual body of the Moon set at 300°13′ and the RAMC was at 298°14′ (Moon above DESC = change, stolen by GOP).

And again in 2021 when inaugural RAMC was at 298°15′ and the Moon rose at 292°24′ (Moon above ASC = change).

With those correct calls the test has a record of 28 right calls out of 32 inaugurations (88%).

For the 2025 inauguration the Moon is far below the DESC, a call of no party change.

9 out of 10 ain’t bad.

Like Will Hunting (Matt Damon) stole Sean's (Robin Williams) line in Good Will Hunting tRump stole from Rambo (Rambo First Blood Part II - "...I'm coming to get you!". While it was possible the former could follow up on his declaration it is not likely tRump will succeed in his efforts.

Most elections for president hinge on a small percentage of voters (less than 10%) voting for the loser instead of for the winner.

The history of winners and losers percentages in presidential elections shows that the voting division between political parties is quite small. In most elections the loser got 40% or more of the votes - not far from 51%.

Based on my original post of December 31, 2020.

Last edited Thu Dec 8, 2022, 12:37 am CST. Bolding of loser's percentage has been removed for this posting.

Data gathered from Dave Leips site.

Only 4 times since the American Civil War has the popular vote loser been elected president. In every case it was a Republican candidate that lost the popular vote but won election. (1876, 1888, 2000, 2016).

In 27 of the the 41 elections listed below the loser has garnered more than 40% of the popular vote. That is, in 65.9% or almost in 2 out of 3 elections the loser had almost 1/2 of the voting public in his or her favor.

Only Democratic and Republican party's percentages are shown.

1st column shows the election year, 2nd column the Democratic party percentage of the popular vote, 3rd column the Republican party percentage of the popular vote. In all elections except the 4 noted the winner of the popular vote was elected to the presidency.

Year****Dem%****GOP%

2020****51.27%***46.82%
2016****48.02%***45.93% POP LOSER STILL ELECTED
2012****51.01%***47.15%
2008****52.86%***45.60%
2004****48.26%***50.73%
2000****48.38%***47.87% POP LOSER STILL ELECTED
1996****49.23%***40.72%
1992****43.01%***37.45%
1988****45.65%***53.37%
1984****40.56%***58.77%
1980****41.01%***50.75%
1976*** 50.08%*** 48.01%
1972*** 37.52%*** 60.67%
1968*** 42.72%*** 43.42%
1964*** 61.05%*** 38.47%
1960*** 49.72%*** 49.55%
1956*** 41.97%*** 57.37%
1952*** 44.33%*** 55.18%
1948*** 49.55%*** 45.07%
1944*** 53.39%*** 45.89%
1940*** 54.72%*** 44.77%
1936*** 60.80%*** 36.54%
1932*** 57.41%*** 39.65%
1928*** 40.79%*** 58.22%
1924*** 28.82%*** 54.03%
1920*** 34.12%*** 60.35%
1916*** 49.25%*** 46.11%
1912*** 41.83%*** 23.18%
1908*** 43.04%*** 51.57%
1904*** 37.59%*** 56.42%
1900*** 45.51%*** 51.66%
1896*** 46.71%*** 51.02%
1892*** 46.02%*** 43.01%
1888*** 48.63%*** 47.80% POP LOSER STILL ELECTED
1884*** 48.85%*** 48.28%
1880*** 48.22%*** 48.31%
1876*** 50.92%*** 47.92% POP LOSER STILL ELECTED
1872*** 43.78%*** 55.58%
1868*** 47.34%*** 52.66%
1864*** 44.95%*** 55.03%
1860*** 29.52%*** 39.65% "

The Supreme Court first assembled on February 1, 1790, in the Exchange Building in New York City -- then the Nation’s Capital. Chief Justice John Jay was, however, forced to postpone the initial meeting of the Court until the next day since, due to transportation problems, some of the Justices were not able to reach New York until February 2.

The earliest sessions of the Court were devoted to organizational proceedings. The first cases reached the Supreme Court during its second year, and the Justices handed down their first opinion on August 3, 1791 in the case of West v. Barnes.

(From a defunct link)When did the Supreme Court first meet?

The first meeting of the Court was scheduled to take place in New York City on Monday, February 1, 1790, but the lack of a quorum (only three of the six Justices were present) delayed the official opening until the following day, Tuesday, February 2, 1790.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/institution.aspx
******************************************************

"From the Record: U.S. Supreme Court first convened by ceremony, at 1:00 p.m. LAT, lower Broad Street, New York City. [Source: New York Law Review, March 1940.]

i_predict, Msg 23936
Posted By: blazingstar1776 , Tue Jan 5, 2010 8:36 pm

The 1790 supreme court chart @ lower Manhattan (NYC) captures the inaugural ceremony convened at 1:00 p.m. local apparent time, which makes it 13:14:14 hrs LMT +4:56:04. Note the Moon anti-culminating @ 24-Vi-52

John"

tRump may have his last hurrah on Labor Day when his progressed Moon conjoins his progressed Jupiter. After that it goes on to square his natal Saturn/Pluto midpoint, his progressed Saturn, and aspect other challenging points.

What can tRump expect on or near July 12? I used near because I do not know where he will be and I use locality charts.