Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rand Paul is more likely to eliminate important Government agencies than Hillary. [View all]MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)41. Most elected Democrats voted against war in Iraq
Last edited Mon Aug 25, 2014, 03:01 PM - Edit history (1)
It wasn't just a little fuck up. It killed hundreds of thousands, and was one of the major contributors to our country imploding for the 99%.
Rand would likely be far worse, but Hillary has big problems.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rand Paul is more likely to eliminate important Government agencies than Hillary. [View all]
trumad
Aug 2014
OP
Holy libertarian, Batshitcrazyman, only now does America get that liberal and libertarian views
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#1
I think they put something in the water to cause mass amnesia and the media knows it....
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#7
Knowing that something is happening is the only way to begin to change it.........
wandy
Aug 2014
#43
+1 Just because Paul is a small gubmint whackjob, doesn't make Hillary FDR
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2014
#18
Whether or not you feel he could get elected, Progressives need to get behind Bernie in as big a way
Dustlawyer
Aug 2014
#31
I worship the ground of whomever can kick Republican ass....and right now...that's HER!!!
VanillaRhapsody
Aug 2014
#65
you must be one of those people that bring great joy when they leave the room.
hobbit709
Aug 2014
#66
Democracy does not require anyone to vote for your candidate, if that was the intent voting in the
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#73
You are ON a political blog....I stipulated if they were ON this political blog....
VanillaRhapsody
Aug 2014
#74
Being on a website is also meaningless to your "point". One could believe wholeheartedly in
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#75
That is what I said. None of that requires voting for any party's nominee even if you are a member
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#79
Do you understand the very concept of Democracy means.....YOU are not guaranteed to get YOUR way
VanillaRhapsody
Aug 2014
#85
But both of them will make sure that existing government agencies serve corporate America!
cascadiance
Aug 2014
#19
getting shot in the head is likelier to be lethal than ebola: let's all get ebola!
MisterP
Aug 2014
#20
The fact that one has to grasp at a straw to find a reason to vote for her is disturbing
LiberalLovinLug
Aug 2014
#30
Why the fuck does everything have to be a comparison between Rand Paul and Hillary?
tularetom
Aug 2014
#32
Remember the Paulbots are very good at gaming the system, and with the Koch money, anything goes.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#45
We can be sure his Libertine notion of ending the wars will be the first to go out the window, along
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#44
I seriously doubt that Hillary would eliminate any important government agency.
3rdwaydem
Aug 2014
#53