Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)By conflating gender and sex we undermine sporting competition [View all]
Laurel Hubbard, 43, is poised to become the first transgender Olympian after being picked for New Zealands weightlifting team.
From article:
By conflating gender and sex, I would argue we fudge the very reason we have sex categories in sport: the male performance advantage. Without a separate category for females, there would be no women in Olympic finals. Even in the 100m, one of the events with the smallest performance gap, approximately 10,000 men worldwide have personal bests faster than the current Olympic female champion, Elaine Thompson-Herah (10.70sec). And its not just track and field. While the smallest attainment gap between the sexes comes in running, rowing and swimming events (11-13%), this moves up to 16%-22% in track cycling, and between 29% and 34% when it comes to bowling cricket balls and weightlifting. The difference in punch power between men and women is a whopping 162%. Not, then, to be sniffed at. But the International Olympic Committee tweaked its guidelines in 2015 to allow athletes such as Hubbard to compete in the womens category, provided their total testosterone level in serum is kept below 10 nanomoles per litre for at least 12 months. Transgender men face no restrictions in the male category for obvious reasons.
Increasingly, however, research is showing that these testosterone guidelines do not guarantee the fair competition the IOC was hoping for. Ross Tucker, a sports scientist and expert on testosterone advantage in sport, succinctly sums it up: Lowering of testosterone is almost completely ineffective in taking away the biological differences between males and females. There is just no proof that reducing testosterone takes away the advantage of muscle mass, strength, lean body mass, muscle size or bone density. Despite this new evidence from Drs Emma Hilton and Tommy Lundberg, the IOC has put off any further decisions making until after Tokyo and left it up to individual sports federations to decide their own transgender policies. Some have been bold, others have written their policies alongside trans lobby groups without consulting womens organisations or sports scientists. Those questioning the narrative are accused of transphobia as Martina Navratilova and Nicola Adams have discovered.
The most common argument used in favour of inclusion is that sport is all about natural advantage and that being a trans woman is just another factor to add to the list alongside Michael Phelpss size 14 feet and double-jointed ankles. The problem with this argument is that we dont compete according to foot-size, but we do protect the integrity of womens sport because the advantage gained from male puberty is so comprehensive in terms of speed, power, strength and so much else. Phelpss feet gave him an advantage as a swimmer; male puberty gave him a much bigger advantage across the board. At the Beijing Olympics, he won the 200m freestyle in 1.42.96, breaking the world record. Federica Pellegrini broke the womens world record at the same distance, finishing in 1.54.82 a time that wouldnt have got her into the mens semi-finals. It wasnt internalised misogyny slowing her down.
also: "Serena Williams told David Letterman that were she to play Andy Murray, I would lose, 6-0, 6-0, in
maybe 10 minutes. Male puberty and androgens give an advantage in a different stratosphere.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2021/jun/22/by-conflating-gender-and-sex-we-undermine-sporting-competition