Trump's evolution from being "100 percent" willing to testify under oath (June 2017) to "we'll see

[kpete]

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[nocoincidences]

1. Perhaps someone should ask the stable genius if he has the word

SUBPOENA in his vast fourth grade vocabulary?

[Squinch]

2. Did he really say that Democrats have "a tremendous advantage in the electoral college?"

Does he ever open his mouth without lying?

ETA: But happily, he looks like shit on a sidewalk. Not a healthy guy, that.

[AmericanActivist]

3. Oh! The nerve of this jackass! Who does he think

he is. This isn’t optional. It’s not like “we’ll see” is an option. There is precedent that indicates he does not have a choice. I hope they subpoena his lying treasonous ass and make him testify without people around to save him.

[Eliot Rosewater]

4. Appeal to his ego, which is bigger than downtown Washington, DC.

We know his lawyers dont want him to testify, his family, his co-conspirators, etc.

[Freethinker65]

5. TBH he might have no memory of saying that. His mental capacity and cognitive skills have declined

When he originally said it, he had no intention of actually testifying though.

[gratuitous]

6. "All the Democrats say there was no collusion"

"This is a Democrat hoax." Both statements can't be true, Donald. They're what's known in the trade as mutually exclusive propositions.

But let's talk about Hillary Clinton, shall we? She went before Trey Gowdy's committee for 11 solid hours, facing down the most hostile questioning imaginable, repetitious with dark insinuations. She answered fully, truthfully, and honestly every question put to her, under oath, without an attorney. You're on record, Donald, as saying that Hillary Clinton didn't have the stamina to be president. Would you be agreeable to a little Q&A session up on Capitol Hill? You know, just to show everyone all the stamina you have?

[Gothmog]

7. For this thread

:large