Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

triron

(22,003 posts) Wed Jan 24, 2018, 06:15 PM Jan 2018

HuffPo: There was a domestic conspiracy against HRC (players are Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani,

Donald Trump and elements of the FBI at the NY field office), which also dovetailed with
the Trump-Russia conspiracy to put Trump in the WH. This is a conspiracy of epic proportions (my words).

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-domestic-conspiracy-that-gave-trump-the-election_us_587ed24fe4b0b110fe11dbf9?

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HuffPo: There was a domestic conspiracy against HRC (players are Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani, (Original Post) triron Jan 2018 OP

R#7 &k UTUSN Jan 2018 #1

I was wondering why no one had commented on this, but RandomAccess Jan 2018 #2

Maybe he should have written it in a series Mr. Ected Jan 2018 #3

kick for visibility triron Jan 2018 #4

UTUSN

(70,695 posts)

1. R#7 &k

Reply to triron (Original post)

Wed Jan 24, 2018, 07:31 PM

Jan 2018

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)

2. I was wondering why no one had commented on this, but

Reply to triron (Original post)

Wed Jan 24, 2018, 09:49 PM

Jan 2018

when I went to read the article myself, GOOD LORD. It's one of the worst written pieces of info from Seth Abramson I've seen. I quit after about half. Nevertheless, more people should see this.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)

3. Maybe he should have written it in a series

Reply to RandomAccess (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 24, 2018, 09:56 PM

Jan 2018

Of 100 independent tweets.

triron

(22,003 posts)

4. kick for visibility

Reply to triron (Original post)

Wed Jan 24, 2018, 11:14 PM

Jan 2018

So much of what is written here may very well be borne out over time.

Reply to this discussion