General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcCaskill: Folks, that is a constitutional crisis.
Link to tweet
Congress voted 517-5 to impose sanctions on Russia. The President decides to ignore that law. Folks that is a constitutional crisis. There should be outrage in every corner of this country.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Chakaconcarne
(2,451 posts)onit2day
(1,201 posts)That was a constitutional crisis and the senate dems should have walked out on McConnell. Trump's appointee is illegitimate.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Neither Republicans nor Democrats use the response time to criticize the President personally, but usually point the way forward.
It's often a newish politician being introduced to the nation, and who is presenting the party's, and his, vision for a better America....as I recall.
shanny
(6,709 posts)this isn't a traditional time or pResident.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Real outrage for strong evidence that something very wrong is still going on between Trump and Russia.
His whisperers have had a year now to coax him into enacting. Bannon has been gone since August. Putin's still there.
UpInArms
(51,283 posts)😔
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)What about the hundreds of GOP congress critters that Trump just flipped off? Are they just going to take it?
UpInArms
(51,283 posts)I went to her Town Hall meeting after Charlottesville and she could only say how much she was trying to work across the aisle
smh
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)UpInArms
(51,283 posts)after she piled on Franken
samplegirl
(11,477 posts)She voted for.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)In return, they won't push Trump and will be loyal to him. And he won't destroy their careers and lives, leaving them alone to fill their pockets with those tax cuts. In some cases, they may have been promised a lucrative job when they leave Congress.
I doubt Congress would pass that sanctions bill now.
Atman
(31,464 posts)The window is closing, and he owes a lot of money to the mob. It's payback time.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Now he's up to his eyeballs in debt to Putin.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Trump is up to his eyeballs in debt to the Russian mob.
procon
(15,805 posts)thbobby
(1,474 posts)Have the repugs all colluded? We are witnessing an attempt by Rich Organized Crime to extend their influence from Russia to America with the goal being control of the world. This is not a nationalistic plot, it is an organized crime plot. Christians say the meek shall inherit the earth. The mafia of the world is striving to make sure the rich and corrupt inherit the earth.
erronis
(15,257 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)It's about the Russian Mafia.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)Or actually, do both:
Call 24/7: 202-224-3121
Free Faxes (can incl up to 3 pages attached) to Senators: https://faxzero.com/fax_senate.php
Free Faxes (ditto) to Congress: https://faxzero.com/fax_congress.php
TEXT your faxes: Text RESIST to 50409
Write your MoC - DEMOCRACY.IO https://democracy.io/#/
nini
(16,672 posts)It goes deeper than just 45 - way deeper.
Beemmeup
(1 post)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Response to Beemmeup (Reply #9)
Post removed
welcome to DU
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)up to any and all marches or events.
For a variety of reasons, mostly organization. Before the majority of us realize what we need to do it will be too late.
And we cant even consider a two nation resolution, where clearly a blue USA would prosper and be wonderful, but were we to split in two Putin would roll into the newly weakened America and take over even faster than he is about to do anyway.
oasis
(49,386 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)welcome to the new cold war.
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)action that congress amd or the masses can take to force enforcement.
elmac
(4,642 posts)censure is about the only thing the Senate can do, but they won't, because the fascists are all on Putins side.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)but that was a VERY long time ago. Is this a "pocket veto?" Is it the discretion of the executive branch to do this? Is there anything in the Constitution, one way or the other, about this kind of situation?
deminks
(11,014 posts)Donnie signed this one in August. It is the law of the land. The executive does not interpret laws or pick which ones to enforce.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,346 posts)That thing in the Whitehouse doesn't understand the role of any of the 3 branches of government. Else, he would have been the first to speak up in defense of NFL players exercising their 1st Amendment rights instead of the first to trash them. He took an oath with no understanding of what it meant.
deminks
(11,014 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)that the President "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed". That would apply to all laws - whether sanctions against Russia or federal laws against marijuana (people seemed to get upset recently when Sessions announced he was going to enforce federal law concerning marijuana).
mgardener
(1,816 posts)And let them know of your outrage about this
Also let the Whitehouse know!!!!
www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Bookmark and use often!
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)a gnashing of teeth - is that his "punishment?" Is that all that will happen?
that and a strongly worded tweet. This is what our country has come to in my lifetime - urgent, extremely important conversations or declarations are done through a tweet. How pitiful that we've sunk this far.
Botany
(70,504 posts)Former National Security Council member: Trump was - and is still likely - 'a tool of the Russians'
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017477247
Russia's goal; "undermining U.S. democracy by polarizing the American constituency"
I think Ill leave that to Bob Mueller to answer, Vinograd replied. What I do think is, we already know from the intelligence community and the entire intelligence community agrees on this is that Donald Trump was Russias preferred candidate. Now that is not because any kind of personal love for Donald Trump. It is because they viewed him and his election as being more preferable to advancing their policies and to advancing their mission again of undermining U.S. democracy by polarizing the American constituency and decreasing American leverage around the world, and that is what Vladimir Putin wants.
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)It ignores their role in government. It makes them look unimportant. Those are some pretty big egos there and for once we need them to speak up and assert themselves.
onenote
(42,703 posts)Think about it for a moment. Would all but a handful of republicans have voted for this law if actually would force trump to do anything? Dems went along because it was the best the were going to get.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)oasis
(49,386 posts)spanone
(135,832 posts)TomCADem
(17,387 posts)...and Trumps actions?
shanny
(6,709 posts)or, don't understand the importance of the Iran treaty?
or, just don't like Bernie?
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)It was important to send a message to Russia that we would not tolerate Election interference.
shanny
(6,709 posts)except for tRump.
He's our enemy, not Bernie or even the empty suit that is Rand Paul.
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)mnhtnbb
(31,388 posts)Better yet, impeach him first, then lock him up and throw away the key. Or, bring out the guillotine.
Initech
(100,075 posts)Fuck Fox News.
Hekate
(90,684 posts)I've had it up to here with mealy-mouthed hand-wringing pundits and politicos forever moving it into the vague future: "If he does this, then..." and "If he does that, then..."
"It" has already been done. The Constitutional Crisis has been upon us for some time. Thank you, Senator McCaskill, for saying and naming what is in front of our eyes.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)judesedit
(4,438 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 30, 2018, 05:35 PM - Edit history (1)
I understand that Moveon is also organizing something for tonight with Mark Ruffalo and Michael Moore among others. I received an e-mail on it, so that is all that I know.
bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)Watergate was an inside political grab for power.
Today's scandal effects every American's rights, liberties, freedom, future.
We will feel the effects of this for years, if not decades.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)of this specific law yet.
When Trump signed this bill, he included a "signing statement" that questioned the constitutionality of certain provisions
of the bill (see: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-02/trump-is-said-to-add-concerns-in-signing-russia-sanctions-law ). The constitutionality of the bill has not yet been challenged in court. Unless the bill is challenged and the courts rule against Trump and Trump ignores the ruling there is no "constitutional crisis". Note that other Presidents (including President Obama) have similarly issued "signing statements" when signing certain laws and expressed their intent to interpret the law consistent with their view of the Constitution.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)It is a coup.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)attached signing statement to legislation essentially saying they were going to ignore the bill Bush just signed?
Sadly, the sanctions bill gave Trump a way to not impose sanctions and he and his crew took it.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)They better get on that. Stat.
onenote
(42,703 posts)Ive looked at the statute and it is filled with provisions allowing Trump to waive the imposition of sanctions or otherwise it impose or enforce them.