Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,902 posts)
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 11:36 PM Jan 2018

Victor Cha: Giving North Korea a bloody nose carries a huge risk to Americans North Korean leade

Washington Post:

North Korea, if not stopped, will build an arsenal with multiple nuclear missiles meant to threaten the U.S. homeland and blackmail us into abandoning our allies in Asia. North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un will sell these weapons to state and nonstate actors, and he will inspire other rogue actors who want to undermine the U.S.-backed postwar order. These are real and unprecedented threats. But the answer is not, as some Trump administration officials have suggested, a preventive military strike. Instead, there is a forceful military option available that can address the threat without escalating into a war that would likely kill tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of Americans.

When I was under consideration for a position in this administration, I shared some of these views.

Some may argue that U.S. casualties and even a wider war on the Korean Peninsula are risks worth taking, given what is at stake. But a strike (even a large one) would only delay North Korea’s missile-building and nuclear programs, which are buried in deep, unknown places impenetrable to bunker-busting bombs. A strike also would not stem the threat of proliferation but rather exacerbate it, turning what might be a North Korean moneymaking endeavor into a vengeful effort intended to equip other bad actors against us.

I empathize with the hope, espoused by some Trump officials, that a military strike would shock Pyongyang into appreciating U.S. strength, after years of inaction, and force the regime to the denuclearization negotiating table. I also hope that if North Korea did retaliate militarily, the United States could control the escalation ladder to minimize collateral damage and prevent a collapse of financial markets. In either event, the rationale is that a strike that demonstrates U.S. resolve to pursue “all options” is necessary to give the mercurial Kim a “bloody nose.” Otherwise he will remain undeterred in his nuclear ambitions.


Victor Cha was nominated by Trump as Abmassador to South Korea; he has withdrawn his name from consideration.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Victor Cha: Giving North Korea a bloody nose carries a huge risk to Americans North Korean leade (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2018 OP
R#2 & K. Both WaPo & NYT have paywalls. The NYT Search blurb says the WH withdrew the nom? UTUSN Jan 2018 #1
Time to establish diplomatic relations with North Korea. David__77 Jan 2018 #2

David__77

(23,598 posts)
2. Time to establish diplomatic relations with North Korea.
Wed Jan 31, 2018, 12:03 AM
Jan 2018

And conclude a peace ageeement to replace the armistice.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Victor Cha: Giving North ...