Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Preet Bharara for the win: (Original Post) Kingofalldems Feb 2018 OP
Good for him! BigmanPigman Feb 2018 #1
Peter Strzok? ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #2
What about him? Kingofalldems Feb 2018 #6
Removed from the team and sent back to FBI ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #8
He wasn't removed for wrongdoing sarah FAILIN Feb 2018 #9
Again, I admit to not knowing all the details ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #10
You must have a different news source, lol. sarah FAILIN Feb 2018 #12
Ok, I just didn't follow it that closely ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #15
I've kept up pretty well on this story but never read he said he was voting for Dump ... mr_lebowski Feb 2018 #25
I read it in their texts, sarah FAILIN Feb 2018 #30
Strzok's texts did nothing to jeopardize his clearance lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #27
Level of clearance may not have changed... Wounded Bear Feb 2018 #23
Kind of what I figured ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #24
"Playing devil's advocate" for something you "didn't follow that closely" LanternWaste Feb 2018 #26
Let's let the Devil (i.e. everybody in the RePutin Party) advocate for himself. lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #28
Alright, alright, uncle! ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #31
Cut from the team. nt greyl Feb 2018 #19
Whoa, Dude! Cha Feb 2018 #3
His weekly podcast is always interesting. enough Feb 2018 #4
Mr. Bharara REALLY knows the Art of Taunt Skittles Feb 2018 #5
That is going to hurt. sheshe2 Feb 2018 #7
130? HipChick Feb 2018 #11
If each one donated $1k they could cover Stormy's payoff. Marcuse Feb 2018 #20
F yeah! cp Feb 2018 #13
"He's not fit to be president". Pobeka Feb 2018 #14
Love it Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2018 #16
Epic burn! FakeNoose Feb 2018 #17
People like Preet Bharara are why Trump wants to restrict legal immigration IronLionZion Feb 2018 #18
Great tweet by Preet Gothmog Feb 2018 #21
KICK! Cha Feb 2018 #22
Just moar evidence of DEEPSTATE FBI !!!11!! They won't let BEST PEOPLE have Clearance!! BIASED! mr_lebowski Feb 2018 #29

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
8. Removed from the team and sent back to FBI
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 10:17 PM
Feb 2018

I just wondered if his level of clearance was reduced. To be honest, I haven't been paying attention to him since he was removed.

sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
9. He wasn't removed for wrongdoing
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 10:22 PM
Feb 2018

He was removed to keep even the suspicion of wrong doing from being connected to the investigation.

I'm sure he still has his clearances.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
10. Again, I admit to not knowing all the details
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 10:32 PM
Feb 2018

I thought he was sent away because he texted or emailed anti-tRump messages. Part of the issue was he was using an unsecured service (?). I guess I was asking because I wanted to know if removing all suspicion, as you put it, included a reduced clearance level. I was thinking of a comparison between "punishing" Strzok to keep the team impeccable and the WH's completely haphazard handling of security clearance.

sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
12. You must have a different news source, lol.
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 10:58 PM
Feb 2018

He was not using an unsecured service. He was using his government issued phone to text his paramore to keep their spouses from finding out.
He did not just make texts critical of Trump, he was much more critical of Clinton. I read the texts. He said he was voting for Trump in those texts.

Why do you think he got a lower level clearance? Nothing was a lie that he said.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
15. Ok, I just didn't follow it that closely
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 11:38 PM
Feb 2018

I'm not out to pick on him or Mueller or the OP. It's something that I remember happening and got me thinking about clearance. Thank you for the clarification.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
25. I've kept up pretty well on this story but never read he said he was voting for Dump ...
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:12 PM
Feb 2018

You have a link to that info by any chance? I find myself arguing WRT this guy all the time with wingnuts so want to have all the ammo possible to ridicule them for their stupidity and lies.

sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
30. I read it in their texts,
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:44 PM
Feb 2018

But I've read so many stories on this I can't find that one specifically. I remember it extremely well though. He told her he had decided Trump was right and he was probably going to vote for him. She acted sort of shocked and he said it didn't matter because he hated Clinton and Trump couldn't be that bad, lol. Later he said he was voting for him for sure.
I'll look for it again, but that exchange was gold. I wish we could just get their texts with no story attached.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
27. Strzok's texts did nothing to jeopardize his clearance
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:19 PM
Feb 2018

Though frankly the affair might raise an eyebrow, due to potential for blackmail.

Wounded Bear

(58,660 posts)
23. Level of clearance may not have changed...
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 03:50 PM
Feb 2018

actually probably not. What changes for him as he shifts positions within the bureau would be access.

He may have the same clearance level, but would obviously not have access to further info on the Mueller investigation.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
24. Kind of what I figured
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 04:01 PM
Feb 2018

I was playing devil's advocate in regards to Preet's tweet. Could it be argued that Strzok was an example of someone from Mueller's team who shouldn't have clearance? Obviously it could be argued, but he was sent away as soon as his tweets or emails were discovered.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
26. "Playing devil's advocate" for something you "didn't follow that closely"
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:17 PM
Feb 2018

"Playing devil's advocate" for something you "didn't follow that closely" seems to set oneself up for fail from the start.

"Could it be argued that Strzok was an... ? Obviously it could be argued..."
What valid argument or statute or policy or procedure would support this hypothetical argument?

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
28. Let's let the Devil (i.e. everybody in the RePutin Party) advocate for himself.
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:21 PM
Feb 2018

We really don't need that service here.

Pobeka

(4,999 posts)
14. "He's not fit to be president".
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 11:30 PM
Feb 2018

Who was it that said that, warned us? And almost half of the voters couldn't see the grifter for what he was, and still is. And he's appointed only those who are like him...

IronLionZion

(45,446 posts)
18. People like Preet Bharara are why Trump wants to restrict legal immigration
Wed Feb 14, 2018, 11:57 PM
Feb 2018

In a sea of fish and sharks, Bharara is an orca.



 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
29. Just moar evidence of DEEPSTATE FBI !!!11!! They won't let BEST PEOPLE have Clearance!! BIASED!
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:21 PM
Feb 2018

Will say the wingnuts when presented with this fact ... ZOMG it's just more evidence that FBI hate's Dear Leader ...

I mean, it could not POSSIBLY be that the people he's hired ... just generally SUCK in terms of their morals and past behavior ... hence their willingness to work for the Mafioso Don in the first place ... and hence they really have no business whatsoever in the positions that Trump has placed them.

Nawwww ... couldn't be THAT. Everything Trump is TEH BESTEST!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Preet Bharara for the win...