General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"These school shootings have to stop ... I dont want the government taking my gun."
Same parent of a (surviving) child at the school:
Asked by the Guardian if the tragedy should lead to stricter gun control for people with mental health issues, he replied: I dont want to get into a gun debate. I really dont. What are you going to do? Confiscate everybodys guns? We have millions and millions of weapons Im a gun owner. I dont want the government taking my gun.
Michael Irwin, another parent whose son attended the school, shared Crescitellis view.
All the regulation in the world wouldnt have prevented necessarily what happened today. Its something thats tragic, but what regulation can you pass that takes away the guns that are already out there? he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/15/how-the-florida-high-school-shooting-unfolded-students-gunman
Even people at the heart of the disaster are apathetic and resigned to doing nothing about gun control in the USA.
It's Stockholm Syndrome, with the majority of the American population as the hostages.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)Freedomofspeech
(4,225 posts)lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)that didn't.
Then ask the question again... your child or your gun.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Please self-delete.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)so no, I don't think I will.
B2G
(9,766 posts)lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)over the lives of the children of PEOPLE THEY LIKELY KNOW...
but only because their children didn't die.
If you can't get angry over that attitude... then I don't know what to say.
B2G
(9,766 posts)without wishing death upon his innocent child who has no control over what he says, does or owns.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)professional.
I was most disturbed by hearing that he had a habit of shooting animals.
Shooting animals for the sake of shooting them is often a sign of sociopathy. Many serial killers start out as animal abusers.
However, my point here in this thread (and many others that I have posted to over the last couple of days) is that perhaps if this shooter didn't have access to such weapons (magazine loaded assault rifles) the body count might be lower... much lower. And if a mental health professional flagged this guy he might have been prevented from purchasing any guns.
And then there is the callous reaction of the parents of children who survived.
tblue37
(65,393 posts)unrestricted gun ownership, too.
Too many have been thoroughly propagandized into believing the NRA party line.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Abhorrence is what happened yesterday. Slugs slamming into fifteen and sixteen year old kids is abhorrent. Another day of double-digit victims of gun violence is abhorrent.
Try not to pretend mere satire rises to that same level simply for the sake of your own narrative.
B2G
(9,766 posts)It was just vile.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Satire is often distasteful. Twain's best satire was his ugliest satire (knowing satire as a literary device will assist you in the future-- I promise).
Yet if you still pretend that was vile, never read Mark Twain's The Innocents Abroad-- ensuring your distance from "vileness" is much more important than education.
Your pretense is showing...
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)not the people calling them out.
B2G
(9,766 posts)and expressing a desire that his child had died instead.
You know that.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)And you know the difference between expressing an actual and deeply held sentiment with mere visceral reactions and satire to express a point.
Still, a consistency of pretense layered upon a thick slab of self-righteousness is a wonderful thing to crouch behind.
We both know that.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)Marengo
(3,477 posts)lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)gun rights over lives of children so long as they aren't yours.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Is disgusting. Just who is the deplorable here?
old guy
(3,283 posts)than to speak and remove all doubt.
WestIndianArchie
(386 posts)I dont want to get into a gun debate. I really dont. What are you going to do? Confiscate everybodys guns? We have millions and millions of weapons
Im a gun owner. I dont want the government taking my gun.
means if you take my gun, how am I going to kill people?
I say yes, take their goddamn guns away.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Amazing how ignorant people are.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)He will have that young person out at the range to teach them how to protect themselves. The whole time, doing more trauma to that persons young brain.
America, can do spirit.
msongs
(67,413 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)gun ownership like cigarettes and drunk driving.
Do not give respect to gun ownership. Do not teach gun culture to kids. To not pass on gun culture to successive generations.
Shun guns and gun ownership so that gun owners voluntarily reduce the number of guns in this country. Make voluntary turning in and destruction of guns something we look to the person doing it with pride and admiration. Honor the once owner but no longer an owner.
Work to make the second amendment mean what it says literally not only mean just a part of the wording. Work to repeal the second amendment.
Make that the freedom thing not gun ownership but freedom from guns. Freedom to walk about without gun carrying people around you.
Make "life liberty and the pursuit of happiness" more important than gun ownership.
Hate guns! Stop kowtowing to gun owners and the NRA.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)while doing nothing to prevent mass shootings, that will happen sooner rather than later.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)Then he should be asked "How did they take all those guns away in Australia? How did the government manage to do this?"
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Confiscation is not the only way.
Try strict regulation - real responsibilities that come with deadly power at the squeeze of a trigger.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)I'm not able to get worked up over these things anymore.
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)mnhtnbb
(31,392 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)in a state and also on gun violence in a state.
The issue that is ignored is that people BUY guns and practice with them and ultimately use them because THEY FEEL UNSAFE.
The more guns you have, the more people are inclined to want to buy their own gun and then prepare to use it and actually use it.
The fear is the problem.
If people feel safe, they are less likely to feel they need a gun.
That's my theory. I would like to see some social scientists test it.
The category of people who live in areas in which they actually shoot game is entirely different. A farmer or hunter may shoot a wild animal for food or to protect his/her crops. That is a totally different category of gun owner from the category of gun owners who live in small towns or cities, don't hunt or hunt rarely and have guns because they convince themselves they need them for self-defense.
I'd like to see a study done on this. Why do people allow guns in their houses? Why do they think they "need" them? Why do they want them? What is their imagined scenario for using them?
This, it seems to me, is key for beginning a campaign to control guns realistically.
3catwoman3
(24,005 posts)...if it had been his son who died, not his son's coach?
MariaCSR
(642 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)"...your BULLETS, though-those we might take".
logosoco
(3,208 posts)They just jump right to "the government is going to take my guns away".
This is the same government that looks the other way when a company does things to destroy the planet.
Where do they get the idea that THAT government is going to impede them in any way? And gun owners always seem to think Democrats are going to be the ones to start this confiscation. What in history ever gave them that idea? Seems to me in my lifetime it was the Republicans after Reagan was shot that started thinking about having more rules regarding guns. And wasn't it Reagan himself as governor who started making laws when some black folks started walking around with open carry?
Do they get angry about having to renew their drivers license?
(Why am I even trying to understand how these minds work? They are the same minds that thought trump would be a good idea for POTUS!)
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)hunter
(38,316 posts)Louis1895
(768 posts)It needs to be entertaining so maybe they can include some Jim Jeffries clips.
It needs to pull at peoples' heart strings so include interviews with people who have lost loved ones.
It needs to make people angry so show politicians giving their "thoughts and prayers" comments.
It needs to show how the shooting affect people from all walks of life.
It needs to show the Russian influence on the NRA (think: Alexander Torshin)
It needs to conclude with a plan for action.
Just my initial thoughts...
pansypoo53219
(20,978 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)That's the way the NRA frames the argument, but it's a lie.