Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not old enough to buy a Miller Lite. Old enough to buy an AR-15 (Original Post) bigtree Feb 2018 OP
His age is irrelevant. He (or anyone else) should not have able to buy the gun in the first place. LonePirate Feb 2018 #1
I was shooting guns at 11 and drinking Millers at 17 ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #2
I wish the problem was limited to these weapons bigtree Feb 2018 #3
Raise the age to 21 and require safe storage of parents guns with kids not having access Amishman Feb 2018 #4
My point was different ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #5
I made a thread about raising the age to 21earlier Calculating Feb 2018 #6

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
2. I was shooting guns at 11 and drinking Millers at 17
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 04:48 PM
Feb 2018

Laws don't mean anything. Access is everything. Controlling who has access to assault rifles (meaning only the military gets to have them) is the way to go.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
3. I wish the problem was limited to these weapons
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:12 PM
Feb 2018

...banning them would seem a no-brainer, at this point, but we know the opposition covets guns more than lives.

I wish politics was as simple as seeking the most comprehensive solution and having it propelled into action or law on its own initiative. Reality is, we need to seek and enact every remedy short of that worthwhile (but politically elusive) goal of eliminating all assault weapons.

I also don't think you can apply your own life experience with guns to the entirety of the nation. Age is as relevant to gun ownership as it is to operating an automobile. Moreover, refusing to regulate such a potentially dangerous object in the minutia, because you advocate a more grand solution, is just myopic and irresponsible.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
4. Raise the age to 21 and require safe storage of parents guns with kids not having access
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 05:19 PM
Feb 2018

As I said in another discussion, only the stupidest Republican could try to fight this one.

Edit: sorry this was meant to be a response to the original topic

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
5. My point was different
Thu Feb 15, 2018, 06:02 PM
Feb 2018

Actually, I should break it into two separate points. 1) Assault rifles should be left in military hands 2) Gun ownership must be restricted. Number two is dependent upon age and background checks, and should be the avenue we pursue as regards to new legislation. So I agree with you, but I just want to point out that we shouldn't stop at raising the age. I want to stress that it is merely a first step.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not old enough to buy a M...