General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump White House quietly issues report vindicating Obama regulations
Trump White House quietly issues report vindicating Obama regulations
It was easy to miss, but OMB demolishes the GOPs deregulatory claims.
By David Roberts@drvoxdavid@vox.com
Mar 6, 2018, 9:30am EST
snip//
For instance, why would the Environmental Protection Agency close a program investigating the effects of toxins on childrens health? Is there some evidence that the money is wasted or poorly spent? Why would the EPA allow more unregulated disposal of toxic coal ash? Dont people in coal regions deserve clean air and water? Is there any reason to think coal ash is currently well-regulated?
These questions barely come up anymore. Republicans oppose regulations because they are regulations; its become reflexive, both for the party and for the media the covers them.
As it happens, though, we know something about the costs and benefits of federal regulations. In fact, Trumps own administration, specifically the (nonpartisan, at least for now) White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), just released its annual report on that very subject. (Hat tip to E&E.)
The report was released late on a Friday, with Congress out of session and multiple Trump scandals dominating the headlines. A cynical observer might conclude that the administration wanted the report to go unnoticed.
Why might that be? Well, in a nutshell, it shows that the GOP is wrong about regulations as a general matter and wrong about Obamas regulations specifically. Those regulations had benefits far in excess of their costs, and they had no discernible effect on jobs or economic growth.
OMB, more like OMG, amirite?
OMB gathered data and analysis on major federal regulations (those with $100 million or more in economic impact) between 2006 and 2016, a period that includes all of Obamas administration, stopping just short of Trumps. The final tally, reported in 2001 dollars:
Aggregate costs: $59 to $88 billion
By even the most conservative estimate, the benefits of Obamas regulations wildly outweighed the costs.
According to OMB and to the federal agencies upon whose data OMB mostly relied the core of the Trumpian case against Obama regulations, arguably the organizing principle of Trumps administration, is false.
more...
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/3/6/17077330/trump-regulatory-agenda-omb
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Beartracks
(12,814 posts)==========
Phoenix61
(17,003 posts)Obama is a very smart man who is smart enough to know what he doesn't know. That allows him to ask people who do know. The fact he can read a chapter book doesn't hurt.
Marcuse
(7,480 posts)As in nobody knew health care is complicated.
pandr32
(11,583 posts)We need to get it out there.
Ninga
(8,275 posts)groundloop
(11,519 posts)I guess that statement goes in the No Shit Sherlock category, but hey, the more people that hear it the better.
mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)This is still a draft; not sure what additional steps are needed for it to become final.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/draft_2017_cost_benefit_report.pdf
gademocrat7
(10,657 posts)They_Live
(3,233 posts)They protect our health and lives.
nature-lover
(1,469 posts)They_Live
(3,233 posts)and change the conversation. "You don't want to protect American families?"
FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)... of "Things to Hate Republicans For."
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)They want pure capitalism without any government controls. Picture Rollerball with no penalties and no time limit.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)for regulations implemented under Bill Clinton, if I recall.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,654 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)Rush says them are job killin' regulashuns.
Cha
(297,211 posts)President Obama