Daniels lawyer: Not all evidence will be mentioned tonight

[brettdale]

Note: (a) not all of our evidence will be mentioned/displayed tonight – that would be foolish; (b) we are not sure what CBS will include but we know a lot from the full interview will have to be cut bc of the time allowed; (c) tonight is not the end – it’s the beginning. #basta

I take this to mean, its going to be one boring freaking interview with no actual evidence produced, wow even
before its aired, we have had a mini Al Capone vault moment.

I mean hes saying a lot will have to be cut from the interview, this is not the thing you say, if
the public is expecting something big.

[dameatball]

1. Crap! We signed up for an expose not a mini-series!!

[unblock]

2. This might be bad for ratings but it's good lawyering.

He's mostly trying to make Donnie sweat so he can negotiate a better settlement on stormy's behalf.

Goosing the ratings isn't his goal.

He wants Donnie to know, or at least think, that Stormy has more aces up her sleeve.

[brettdale]

4. But as for Anderson Copper

It's BS, what a complete and utter joke.

[ProudLib72]

3. Strip tease the nation!

Bow chicka bow bow!

[Hoyt]

5. She exposed little on Kimmel a month ago, tonight will be same.

[brettdale]

6. Kimmel I can understand, hes just a comedian

But this is cooper on 60 minutes.

Why the Fuck would he agree to do a interview, where nothing of
significance gets revealed.

Hes about to be torn a new one by everybody.

[hlthe2b]

7. your "concern" is duly noted... As in your other posts on this... I hardly call this a backfire...

I fully believe this part of the attorney's legal strategy--to take the fight to both courtroom and Trump's own playground--the televised media. I think he knows how readily this is pushing buttons with Trump--buttons that will cause him to self-harm his own case/position.

I don't think she need do any more than show up to have successfully fulfilled THAT part of the strategy.

[brettdale]

8. Im calling it now

Trump wont do one tweet about it, he wont be concerned, this drip threading evidence
thing in my opinion is BS. If Michael had anything, he would present it.

[hlthe2b]

9. I never said he would tweet about it. This smart lawyer knows it affects Trump's overall response

which thus far has been very self-destructive.

[brettdale]

10. He wont response in anyway

Another thread got it right, this is just dainels lawyer trying to make
his client famous, if they had anything, anything at all, it would be out there.

This, we are going to drip feed it, to get a reaction from Trump is laughable.

[hlthe2b]

11. No smart lawyer lays out his case and all evidence ahead of time.

Nonsense! But, I'm sure there are those on other websites that would agree with you essentially that Trump is the smartest, this lawyer a dunce, and that all this (and Russia) is a nothing burger.

The question for you, is why are you trying so hard to convince the rest of us NOT TO WATCH? Why do you Care? HMMM?

[madville]

13. Is this the same smart lawyer that let her

enter into a NDA, with a $1,000,000 penalty for each violation, for the mere sum of $130,000?

[hlthe2b]

14. No it is not. She had another (and very questionable) lawyer who negotiated that.

You seem to be misinformed.

[madville]

15. I asked a question because I didn't know

No need to be rude.

[hlthe2b]

16. I don't believe I was. I answered your question.

[LuckyCharms]

12. Actually, no evidence has to be presented on TV.

That doesn't mean she won't make the allegations.