Alan Dershowitz, schill and a contextual liar, just had a confidential dinner with Donald Trump.

[populistdriven]

Schill: A shill, also called a plant or a stooge, is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization. (see Alan Dershowitz).

Contextual Liar: "If you know something is false but you qualify it sufficiently to defend the lie then you are a liar." (see Alan Dershowitz).

Does ANYBODY actually believe AD did not give Trump legal advice this week? At the very least (doubtful but he is a nerd) AD took $1 from Trump so he could say he was Trump's client but since it was all verbal (except for the dollar) there is no proof AD is Donald's client or gave him legal advice.

Alan Dershowitz is also a coward, he picked the perfect mark in Chuck Todd who tee'd up every question AD asked for: https://www.msnbc.com/mtp-daily/watch/full-dershowitz-rosenstein-recusal-from-russia-investigation-might-be-appropriate-1208461891972 Is AD planning on visiting any of the more formidable evening anchors?

AD says Rosenstein "should recuse himself" and that Trumps lawyers should make a motion if Rosenstein "PARTICIPATED IN ANY WAY IN A PROCESS THAT WAS ADVERSE TO THE INTERESTS OF OF PRESIDENT TRUMP."

AD also states with respect to Trump firing Rosenstein that Trump "might have a constitutional right to arrange (hand gestures), he might have to do it indirectly."

AD confirms to Todd that he told Slate that his "advice to the president would be: don't fire, don't pardon, don't tweet and don't testify",..."Right."

AD states to Todd: "I want to be clear, I did not give the president any legal advice. I never give legal advice to anyone unless I am their lawyer and my legal advice is subject to client confidentially. By the way client confidentially suffered a big blow the other day when the lawyer for Donald Trump's home and office were raided and they took all (hand gestures) of his material and just put it in front of a taint team".

At times it seems he can't even keep his lies straight because when interviewed the same day by Haaretz: "When I give advice to the President," he said, "I keep it confidential." https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/trump-meets-alan-dershowitz-amid-syrian-and-mueller-probe-tensions-1.5991344

So Alan, did you confidentially not give Trump give "legal" advice? I assume you can't say since it was 'confidential'.

Alan, your flurry of public interviews have revealed plenty about the 'legal' advice you have for DT, Perhaps infinitely more since you can't divide by zero, which is all that has leaked directly out of Robert Mueller's investigation, whether over a Porter an Ale or a Bud.

Say Alan, one more thing, did your legal advice to your friend Trump include that "Donald, crimes are Crimes!"?
http://www.msnbc.com/the-beat-with-ari-melber/watch/former-prosecutor-rebuts-dershowitz-s-trump-defense-crimes-are-crimes-1103222851967

3 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
	Alan Dershowitz is a schill for Trump.
	0 (0%)
	Alan Dershowitz is a contextual liar.
	2 (67%)
	Alan Dershowitz has NEVER given Trump legal advice.
	1 (33%)
	Who is Alan Dershowitz?
	0 (0%)
	A schill & a liar (both 1 & 2 ).
	0 (0%)
	1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Eliot Rosewater]

1. Someone said he wants SC seat. Makes sense.

As angry as I am at Alan right now, he would be better for justice on the SC than any other person dumbfuck would appoint.

Is Alan playing the long game here, trying to SAVE the SC ??

Anything is possible, but I am super pissed at him and have been for a while now.

[populistdriven]

8. I hadn't considered that but it makes sense and

my first impression is that yes he would be better than any other Trump would offer up.

[Bleacher Creature]

2. I didn't think it possible for him to have a worse client than OJ. Nt

[populistdriven]

7. Thanks for pointing that out and Trump is using the same 'the police did it' defense that OJ used.

Fortunately Benjamin Wittes is on the side of truth and justice:

Link to tweet

also: Entrapment ‘almost impossible’ to prove in federal cases

[IphengeniaBlumgarten]

3. I have seen speculation that there is compromising info on Dershowitz

due to association with Jeffery(?) Epstein. No idea if this is true, but could explain his assistance to Trump.

[populistdriven]

4. Registered sex offender living in the US Virgin Islands... Any decent reporters in the USVI? nt

[guillaumeb]

5. I prefer options 1 and 2.

[populistdriven]

6. gotcha! (added that option) nt

[populistdriven]

9. Also annoying,

AD says Rosenstein "should recuse himself" and that Trumps lawyers should make a motion if Rosenstein "PARTICIPATED IN ANY WAY IN A PROCESS THAT WAS ADVERSE TO THE INTERESTS OF OF PRESIDENT TRUMP."

Wouldn't that exclude every one in Justice that has ever participated in the Mueller investigation?