Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 08:46 AM Jul 2012

UK Olympic Chair announces 16 year old female swimmer "clean". No doping. History made

after breaking the world record in the women's swimming 400m, with a final freestyle leg faster than the winning male swimmer in the same event.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-19062639
<snip>
Teenage Chinese swimmer Ye Shiwen is not a drug cheat, the British Olympic Association's chairman has said, after a US coach cast doubt on her world record-breaking swim.

Lord Colin Moynihan said Ye, 16, had passed drug tests, was "clean" and deserved recognition for her talent.

Ye smashed her personal best by at least five seconds in the 400m Medley.

Senior US coach John Leonard said her performance was disturbing and hinted that doping could have been involved.
-----
92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UK Olympic Chair announces 16 year old female swimmer "clean". No doping. History made (Original Post) leveymg Jul 2012 OP
She beat the male time... I think that is what is driving them crazy. hlthe2b Jul 2012 #1
or could be history. and yea her but 5 secs? wow. seabeyond Jul 2012 #2
No drug can make you swim 5 seconds faster that your personal best. leveymg Jul 2012 #6
Except testosterone, dianabol, etc. AngryAmish Jul 2012 #11
All those hormonal drugs work over time. She's been tested and retested for them. leveymg Jul 2012 #16
The human race is evolving. We just might not like what we are evolving into. AngryAmish Jul 2012 #19
We all have personal choices in the directions we take. leveymg Jul 2012 #25
I disagree.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #54
By how much did FLo Jo improve her PB at the 1988 Olympics malaise Jul 2012 #13
You tell me? leveymg Jul 2012 #17
Yup obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #38
what kills me about the East German girls is that they didn't knowingly use steroids WolverineDG Jul 2012 #53
I know, and that's what the Chinese girls do, too obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #55
Correct re Flo Jo malaise Jul 2012 #83
Some countries are just better at masking the drug use obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #39
Several of the men beat her over the last 50m; Lochte was fastest overall muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #30
It's the five seconds, not even that she beat a male. xmas74 Jul 2012 #34
Ian Thorpe improved his PB over 400m by 5 seconds between 15 and 16, to get the world record muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #37
And that too had to be investigated. xmas74 Jul 2012 #59
And she was tested after the race, and passed muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #65
Exactly. xmas74 Jul 2012 #66
You apparently did not even read my post hlthe2b Jul 2012 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author xmas74 Jul 2012 #60
Stephanie Rice JonLP24 Jul 2012 #56
And you know she was heavily tested. xmas74 Jul 2012 #62
I don't know if she was more than ususual JonLP24 Jul 2012 #63
From what I remember xmas74 Jul 2012 #64
If you have information that shows she was tested JonLP24 Jul 2012 #87
No, many countries don't have a clean past. xmas74 Jul 2012 #88
Last night JonLP24 Aug 2012 #90
She beat the male time for the same event? I don't think so Cali_Democrat Jul 2012 #57
Why the snark? NPR reported all morning long that her time in the final 50 meters beat hlthe2b Jul 2012 #70
You posted flamebait, that's why mathematic Jul 2012 #71
That's ridiculous.. but if I had meant that, you certainly would have proven the point. hlthe2b Jul 2012 #73
I'm glad you see the validity of my argument. mathematic Jul 2012 #76
Ummm....what did I say that was snark? Cali_Democrat Jul 2012 #72
No.. reading comprehension is important. hlthe2b Jul 2012 #75
In your post that I first replied to, you said: Cali_Democrat Jul 2012 #77
I didn't specify... that is a long way from your misrepresenting by "filling in' what you wanted me hlthe2b Jul 2012 #78
You didn't secifiy the 50m and I did Cali_Democrat Jul 2012 #79
I just heard that she passed all the drug tests. HappyMe Jul 2012 #3
That, unfortunately, means nothing obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #40
Well, then, every other Olympic medal and record means nothing leveymg Jul 2012 #48
I still have doubts. Are_grits_groceries Jul 2012 #4
Not only are there new designer drugs.. ananda Jul 2012 #8
With a name like "Yay, She Win!" she is well named. nt MADem Jul 2012 #5
Faster than a man; not an American ... earthside Jul 2012 #7
Take the sarcasm off. ananda Jul 2012 #9
bwahahahahahaaa spanone Jul 2012 #12
Just a little gripe here, but sibelian Jul 2012 #85
lol! HappyMe Jul 2012 #14
nope. there would be questions no matter where the swimmer was from. cali Jul 2012 #22
Only the final 50m JonLP24 Jul 2012 #61
Not from me obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #41
Five seconds off her time xmas74 Jul 2012 #36
Awesome swim. bemildred Jul 2012 #10
In other news, Olympic official discovers hotel companion "unclean" jberryhill Jul 2012 #15
Their STILL finding new drugs in L. Armstrong's blood from 10 years ago. IOC resolves this in a day? Romulox Jul 2012 #18
bullshit. totally incongruent with her history. cali Jul 2012 #20
history? spanone Jul 2012 #24
I didn't buy Flo Jo either n/t malaise Jul 2012 #31
Me either, or Marion Jones obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #42
That is a surprise Blue_Tires Jul 2012 #21
If a woman suddenly lifted more weight than a male weightlifting champ... Bonobo Jul 2012 #23
If you look at the improvement in women's times in swimming, the curve is far steeper than for men. leveymg Jul 2012 #27
that too would be obvious... LanternWaste Jul 2012 #58
The people most upset are... Atman Jul 2012 #26
Marion Jones tested clesn, too -- Ye is dirty obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #28
Bob Beamon's World Record Long Jump - 1968 Olympics cleduc Jul 2012 #29
Congratulations to Ye Shiwen. Inspiring performance. KurtNYC Jul 2012 #32
+100 G_j Jul 2012 #33
Thank you. HappyMe Jul 2012 #35
This! Good for her, it was an amazing performance. polly7 Jul 2012 #43
None of that helps her turns Are_grits_groceries Jul 2012 #44
One thing that has changed is training methods bhikkhu Jul 2012 #46
I want to see Bob Costas do those turns. KurtNYC Jul 2012 #47
100% agree obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #49
I've had a few posters here argue with me about how it's sour grapes. xmas74 Jul 2012 #68
Yup obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #74
I am watching Faux, and they discussed this siligut Jul 2012 #82
Congrats to her JonLP24 Jul 2012 #50
Good for her. It was an amazing swim despite the sour grapes. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2012 #51
Sometimes americans can be bad sports. Shame on trying to ruin a young girls reputation. southernyankeebelle Jul 2012 #52
China has had problems with athletes doping xmas74 Jul 2012 #67
Maybe so but it sure would have been nice if made his complaint to the officials in private. southernyankeebelle Jul 2012 #69
"It makes the americans look like sour grapes."??? That doesn't make any sense. Romulox Jul 2012 #80
Chill friend, it's just an expression. You are entitled to your opinion OK. Don't make a southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #89
It's not my opinion. It's called "Aesop's Fables". That's where the expression came from. nt Romulox Aug 2012 #91
Thanks for the information southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #92
There was an athlete pulled from Chinese Swim in June xmas74 Jul 2012 #84
Well, obviously that clears everything up. Robb Jul 2012 #81
Good for her. A 5 sec improvement is OUTSTANDING! FarLeftFist Jul 2012 #86

hlthe2b

(102,239 posts)
1. She beat the male time... I think that is what is driving them crazy.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 08:52 AM
Jul 2012

If she did so through drugs--I hope that is exposed.

But, since it appears (at this point) not to be the case--I think this is tremendous.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
2. or could be history. and yea her but 5 secs? wow.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 08:58 AM
Jul 2012
Seven swimmers tested positive for drugs in the 1994 Asian Games, and four years later four Chinese swimmers failed pre-tournament drug tests before the World Championships in Australia.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
6. No drug can make you swim 5 seconds faster that your personal best.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:09 AM
Jul 2012

That came from somewhere deep inside her. It not only announces something important about females in sports, but signals a fundamental shift in the male-female relationship.

I think that's REALLY historic.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
11. Except testosterone, dianabol, etc.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:13 AM
Jul 2012

Ben Johnson won a gold medal and set a world record. For a while.

Put me in the camp of the skeptics.

Steroids work, that is why folks take them.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
16. All those hormonal drugs work over time. She's been tested and retested for them.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:22 AM
Jul 2012

I also find it hard to believe, but until there's some evidence of cheating, I rejoice for her accomplishment. It also makes me hopeful that maybe the human race can evolve. I'd like to see some more evidence of that outside of sports, though.

It's our hearts and minds that really need to grow.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
25. We all have personal choices in the directions we take.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:33 AM
Jul 2012

I believe that we largely become what we want, and pass that down to our children, who learn from our mistakes. Then, they make their own.

Call me an optimist.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
54. I disagree..
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:41 PM
Jul 2012

There's many a slip twixt cup and lip, by which I mean that there are many ways to screw up your life that are far from obvious in advance even assuming you have a reasonably normal personality which by no means everyone does..

There was a DU post up a couple of days ago by hifiguy that addressed this very well I thought..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1046083


I was a high-school dropout at 16. After years of pursuing a life of leisurely bass-playing and vending herbal commodities (being a bum, in essence ) I decided to go to college while working at a dry-cleaning shop where the owner's sister-in-law talked me into giving it a shot. Got my GED on a lark, scoring three 99s, a 95 and a 93. Enrolled at the University of Minnesota at the age of 25, where I graduated four years later summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa. Was admitted to Harvard Law (and 8 of the other 9 schools to which I applied) and graduated three years later with my J.D. and a B+ average. One of my classmates was one Michelle Robinson, n/k/a Michelle Obama.

Since I graduated I have made $50,000 or more on an annual basis for exactly 60 months out of 24 years. I have been unemployed for 67 months of that time, and under-empoyed for virtually all the rest of that time..

I did it all correctly. Excelled everywhere. Went to the best schools. So why have I failed to the point where my retirement plan - when that day comes in another 10 years or so - is a 9mm pistol and a bullet to the temple?

Simple. I was diagnosed as Asperger's in 2005 while undergoing treatment for a severe depressive episode. I was doomed to fail in the legal profession from the start. It's highly social and I am a fundamentally asocial person with few people skills. Brilliant at certain things but utterly unable to make small talk, ingratiate myself with anyone or understand office politics. I clam up and give one-word answers to people I don't know and trust in situations like job interviews. I also feel incredibly awkward in a suit and never really learned how to be an adult in social terms: never had a date, much less a relationship (now by choice) or ever been able to hold a decent-paying job. When I described Asperger's to a good friend, who was a very high-ranking executive (I met him through our common interest in High End home audio, about which I have written for 15+ years), he said "You not only didn't know the rules, you didn't even know there was a game!" And that's about as concise a description of Asperger's as there is.



malaise

(268,976 posts)
13. By how much did FLo Jo improve her PB at the 1988 Olympics
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:17 AM
Jul 2012

What about Marion Jones?
No country is 'exceptional' when it comes to drugs in sports

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
38. Yup
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 11:05 AM
Jul 2012

And, both of them also had physiques that seriously changed. I am loathe to use the term "manly," but women who use performance-enhancing steroids/hormones exhibit "male" physiques. Some East German women were quite literally changed into men.


"Before the 1988 season, Griffith Joyner's best 100 meter time was 10.96 seconds. In 1988 she improved that by 0.47 seconds (or 0.35 sec for the non-wind aided time). Similarly, her pre-1988 best at 200 meters was 21.96. In 1988 she improved that by 0.62 seconds to 21.34, another time that has not been approached."

I have Marion Jones' PB for 100m and 200m, and the Sydney Games, but am having trouble finding times before 1998.

WolverineDG

(22,298 posts)
53. what kills me about the East German girls is that they didn't knowingly use steroids
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:41 PM
Jul 2012

they were told they were taking "vitamins" by their coaches.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
55. I know, and that's what the Chinese girls do, too
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:52 PM
Jul 2012

They really don't know.

Western Athletes know exactly what the hell they are taking, even if they don't ask.

Juicing is juicing, though, and it isn't fair to the athletes who don't.

And, for all of them, it destroys their bodies and can cause early deaths.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
30. Several of the men beat her over the last 50m; Lochte was fastest overall
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:49 AM
Jul 2012
However, her world-record time was still 23 seconds slower than Lochte's winning time, and several of Lochte's competitors were faster than her over the final 50m.

Chinese officials also pointed out that Lochte was easing to the finish, comfortably in the lead, whereas Ye had to battle to the end to take first place.


So I think that point isn't really relevant - Lochte wasn't pushed, so he eased up (sensible, given he'll have future events - presumably he had decided not to try for a record).

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
34. It's the five seconds, not even that she beat a male.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:12 AM
Jul 2012

I have a swimmer in the family and this is about the five seconds.

I'm not racist, I'm not sexist but five seconds-yeah, I'd want it investigated. Five seconds is absolutely mind-boggling. Five seconds in the pool would be like cutting 30 seconds off the world record mile time-something that would be investigated.

You want this to be clean and China has a history of not always being on the up-and-up. They've had a history of their swim team doping in the more recent past. (Since 1990 more than 40 have tested positive and that doesn't include the ones the team pulled at the last minute because complaints were being lodged before the meet.) And it's not just swimming-look at women's gymnastics. They don't play by the rules there either. In 2000 records were falsified and an underage competitor was allowed to compete.

It's not that it's a woman. It's that this is China, with a previous history, and it's five seconds.
Bells would go off in anyone's head.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
37. Ian Thorpe improved his PB over 400m by 5 seconds between 15 and 16, to get the world record
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:42 AM
Jul 2012
Australian Ian Thorpe, who has won five Olympic golds, says the way the body develops during the teenage years makes such feats possible.

He says from the age of 15 to 16, his personal best in the 400m freestyle improved by five seconds, allowing him to take the world record.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19061026


Ye was 7 seconds faster than her time last year; but it's not that far ahead of what Thorpe did. No, I don't think "cutting 30 seconds off the world record mile time" is equivalent to this - she broke the old record by 1.02 seconds.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
59. And that too had to be investigated.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:11 PM
Jul 2012

Drug tests are usually mandatory after a race. Heck, they can be given after regional junior level races. (Don't believe me-I've watched it happen.)

If it's too fast then yes, it needs to be done.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
65. And she was tested after the race, and passed
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jul 2012

All medal winners are tested in swimming at the Olympics.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
66. Exactly.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:33 PM
Jul 2012

Everyone is tested. There can be calls for additional tests to be done, as there was here. This has also been done in the past, especially when the athletes involved have been from countries that have been involved in previous violations. Australia was on a short leash for a long time due to doping.

As recently as this year, an swimmer from China was suspended for doping. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Zhesi The swimmer was dropped from the team. This is enough reason for some to demand that further testing be done and it's within their rights.

hlthe2b

(102,239 posts)
45. You apparently did not even read my post
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 11:17 AM
Jul 2012

Because you certainly have misrepresented
what I "said" to infer so explicitly that
I took the result without question.

My post was actually quite short so I think
actually reading it and not reinterpreting
it is not too much to ask


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #45)

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
56. Stephanie Rice
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jul 2012

Shaved 6 seconds to hit the 4:31:46 mark at the Australian trials. She eventually reduced it under 4:30 to set the record which is now broken.

The person's record she broke shaved even more when Rice set the record.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
62. And you know she was heavily tested.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:15 PM
Jul 2012

Australian swimming had a previous problem with doping. They ran her through every test.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
63. I don't know if she was more than ususual
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jul 2012

They give mandotory tests to anyone w/ a medal as well as other tests all Olympians go through.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
64. From what I remember
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:22 PM
Jul 2012

she was heavily tested. Australia had some problems back in the 80's and 90's-not so far back that it was considered ancient history.

She was tested and heavily so. If there is any suspicion they'll test their samples a few times over-that's what they do in international swimming. Heck, they'll test in junior national swimming.

If you swim too fast the committee wants to know why. That's understandable. If you come from a country with a prior history of not playing by the rules the committee wants to know that everything was on the up-and-up. China has a history of doping-they were found to be using juice back in the mid to late 90's. Some of those in that program back then still have ties.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
87. If you have information that shows she was tested
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 08:46 PM
Jul 2012

more than usual than anyone who gets a medal and record I'd love to see it. So far I haven't seen anything.

The "suspicion" is time when shaving seconds in that range isn't so uncommon. Or at-least, Rice, hasn't had her medals taken for doing that just 4 years ago. Pretty much a lot of countries don't have a clean doping past. There is enough individual desire that "committees" have to worry about everyone, including us. The Olympic Anti-Doper has came out in defense.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
88. No, many countries don't have a clean past.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:09 PM
Jul 2012

The difference is that China was testing positive back in June. That's enough of a red flag for anyone.

If your country has athletes that test positive that close to the Olympics you can bet there will be motions filed. It doesn't matter the country-if it had been the US motions would be filed against us too.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
90. Last night
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 11:30 AM
Aug 2012

it was said Phelps shaved 4 seconds from when he was 14 when he set a world record at 16. I don't know if there was motions filed. I can't recall this kind of "controversy" over something that isn't as unique as it is being made out to be.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
57. She beat the male time for the same event? I don't think so
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:00 PM
Jul 2012

It's my understanding that she was faster in the last 50m or so, but not the entire event.

hlthe2b

(102,239 posts)
70. Why the snark? NPR reported all morning long that her time in the final 50 meters beat
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:03 PM
Jul 2012

Ryan Lochte's time in the same leg of the men's event.

From NYT: On Saturday night, Ye not only shattered the world record in the 400 individual medley, winning gold in 4 minutes 28.43 seconds, she also swam the final 50 meters faster than Ryan Lochte did in winning the men’s race.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/31/sports/olympics/chinese-swimmers-record-raises-doping-concerns.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

Obviously NOT the same event> Men don't compete against women in Olympic swimming. --Boy, seems that has struck some male nerves...

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
71. You posted flamebait, that's why
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:29 PM
Jul 2012

Trying to make this about male pride is ridiculous. Men are faster than women. Everybody knows it. It's a fact as sure as it's a fact that men are taller than women and that women have higher hip to waist ratios than men. Heck, I'm some nobody that's never been competitive on any level and yet at my fastest there were no more than a couple hundred american women faster than me, maybe even fewer. To suggest that people are suspicious of Ye's time because of gender pride is sexist. People are suspicious of Ye's time because it's an unbelievable performance in the post-swimsuit ban era. I mean she swam the freestyle in the 400m IM only 10% slower than its done in the regular 100m freestyle! The usual time is about 20% slower, for men and women.

Also, her 16 year old teammate was busted for EPO last month and the chinese have a long history of doping in swimming. Yet somehow the first thing you suggest behind the suspicion is male pride. What the heck.

hlthe2b

(102,239 posts)
73. That's ridiculous.. but if I had meant that, you certainly would have proven the point.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:43 PM
Jul 2012

My gawd we have a lot of insecurity floating freely around here.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
76. I'm glad you see the validity of my argument.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jul 2012

We'll let the reader decide if the premise is applicable.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
72. Ummm....what did I say that was snark?
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:38 PM
Jul 2012

I just said that for the 400IM, she didn't beat the male time. You said she beat the male time, but she didn't.

Saying she didn't beat the male time in the event is snark? What in the world?

hlthe2b

(102,239 posts)
75. No.. reading comprehension is important.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:48 PM
Jul 2012

That is not what I said. She beat Ryan Lochte's time for the final 50 meters in the same leg of the men's event.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
77. In your post that I first replied to, you said:
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:56 PM
Jul 2012
"She beat the male time...... I think that is what is driving them crazy.

If she did so through drugs--I hope that is exposed.

But, since it appears (at this point) not to be the case--I think this is tremendous. "


You made no mention of..."the final 50 meters in the same leg of the men's event."

I simply clarified. Again....I wasn't trying to be snarky in any way. That was definitely not my intention. In fact, I think it would be a wonderful feat if she did beat the male time for the same event. She was faster in the final 50m which is impressive anyways.

I really think you misunderstood me.

hlthe2b

(102,239 posts)
78. I didn't specify... that is a long way from your misrepresenting by "filling in' what you wanted me
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:01 PM
Jul 2012

to be saying-- so as to set up your strawman's argument. Don't be disingenuous.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
79. You didn't secifiy the 50m and I did
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:06 PM
Jul 2012

Sorry if you feel that was snark. That was not my intention.

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
4. I still have doubts.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:07 AM
Jul 2012

The people working to improve athletic performance also include those with labs. There is no way of knowing if there is some new substance that has been created that doesn't show up on the tests in place now.

The serious dopers will always be a step ahead. The Chinese Government and its resources are a formidable challenge.

ananda

(28,859 posts)
8. Not only are there new designer drugs..
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:10 AM
Jul 2012

.. but there's now also something called
genetic manipulation.

This sounds like the world of futurist scifi,
but it's here now.. and to me it's scary,
fukkin scary.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
7. Faster than a man; not an American ...
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:09 AM
Jul 2012

... and Chinese for Chrissake.

There must be drugs involved.

: :

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
85. Just a little gripe here, but
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:47 PM
Jul 2012

see that little dot at the end of your setence? That IS a period. So you don't actually have to say "period". It's redundant.

Just my little gripe.
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
22. nope. there would be questions no matter where the swimmer was from.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:28 AM
Jul 2012

Why? Because of her own history and because women simply do not have the upper body capacity of men- not in elite swimming.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
61. Only the final 50m
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:13 PM
Jul 2012

was faster than Lochte. Lochte had the race in hand while Ye had to turn on the burners. She was slower overall and slower 50m than several males.

Her own history isn't as impressive as prior record holder who shaved 6 seconds in the trials and 8 overall in Beijing.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
41. Not from me
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 11:08 AM
Jul 2012

And, Americans aren't the only athletes and coaches saying this. Not by a long shot. They know.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
36. Five seconds off her time
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jul 2012

and from a country with a very public recent history of doping?

It's not about being a woman. It's about the time. When you do something that fast it needs to be investigated and not just for the sake of the sport. The young woman (or man, in other events) should be tested for their own safety. These kids do what they're told by their coaches and not everyone has their safety in mind.

I'm glad to hear that she passed. I really am. I have a swimmer at home who is just in awe of what has happened. But drugs shouldn't be allowed in the sports, especially with these kids who are still developing. They have no idea what the future holds with years of doping. If nothing else, catching someone with a positive might save their lives.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
18. Their STILL finding new drugs in L. Armstrong's blood from 10 years ago. IOC resolves this in a day?
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:24 AM
Jul 2012

That's not credible.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
21. That is a surprise
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:26 AM
Jul 2012

Just by sheer chance I happened to be watching that event with a couple of friends, and when I saw her win by like 3 seconds I yelled at the TV: "Now make her pee in a cup and see what comes out!!"


(I think I just like saying "pee in a cup" because it makes me giggle like a schoolgirl)

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
27. If you look at the improvement in women's times in swimming, the curve is far steeper than for men.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:35 AM
Jul 2012

This is not only possible, but the curves in the graphs show it was going to happen about now. She's an outlier, but this can happen. See, http://www.isds.duke.edu/~dalene/chance/chanceweb/131.wainer.pdf

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
58. that too would be obvious...
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:01 PM
Jul 2012

If a poster had a history of minimizing positive achievements for its own sake, that too would be obvious.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
28. Marion Jones tested clesn, too -- Ye is dirty
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:40 AM
Jul 2012

Too much of a huge leap in performance, and her built is exactly like all of the Chinese and East German swimmers who doped.

I cannot be convinced she is clean.

After doping tests improved, female Chinese swimmers disappeared. The tests were improved because of how the Chinese just suddenly had all of these huge, beefy female swimmers who kicked ass in international comps... athletes who just appeared out of nowhere.

Like the Soviets and ESPECIALLY East Germans before them, I am convinced the Chinese sports folks either have some gnarly new juice or juice maskers they are using.

During the Olympics, I root for whomever I like. I am far from a nationalist. I also believe in fair play, and loathe juicing. I know quite a few do it, but when it is this obvious and in your face, it disgusts me.

I don't blame Ye -- refusal to dope would be very bad for her and her family.

 

cleduc

(653 posts)
29. Bob Beamon's World Record Long Jump - 1968 Olympics
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:41 AM
Jul 2012


I don't know what to believe. Too bad drugs have tainted the Olympics so much.

It did remind me of this amazing Olympic moment.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
32. Congratulations to Ye Shiwen. Inspiring performance.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:00 AM
Jul 2012

To doubters: She is now 16 years old and developing rapidly. Her time improvement from last year to this record is -2.5%. 12 months of growth in her frame alone could explain such a gain of speed. Also, the Olympics love records being broken and they build the tracks and pools to help the records be broken.

She passed the drug tests -- no Epogen, no nada. Time to give her credit (and optionally, an apology).

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
44. None of that helps her turns
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 11:17 AM
Jul 2012

or form which are horrible.Her physique has changed, but where does that added speed come from? I doubt that her body has grown in some presribed way that aids her. All athletes hit this growth spurt with different results. Few,if any, have gone FIVE seconds faster.

The pool has not gone through some radical design since the last Olympics. In addition, they banned those swimsuits that aided the swimmer. If the pool was that much of a help, there would be many more records falling by larger times.

The drug tests are always looking for what is known. The dopers are developing methods that will not show up. WADA will catch up and people will be caught. However, the cheats are already moving on to something else.

I will remain suspicious of her times because the Chinese have been caught too many times. I wish I wasn't so jaded, but there have been too many people cheating who swear they are clean. That's too bad. It would be nice to be abe to give her 100% creit.

bhikkhu

(10,715 posts)
46. One thing that has changed is training methods
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 11:26 AM
Jul 2012

and in all sports, the science behind training to optimal performance has driven improvements. The best Chinese swimmers trained in Australia, with the best coaches in the world. Ian Thorpe's coach says Ye Shiwen's times aren't suspect, and its always amusing to see the fastest individuals in many sports have their form criticized...

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
47. I want to see Bob Costas do those turns.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:05 PM
Jul 2012

The pool used here was custom built recently for these games and the manufacturer brags about the latest speed helping features:

Instead of concrete, Myrtha uses a combination of PVC and steel that proves durable, waterproof, and resistant to turbulence that can slow swimmers. Myrtha built pools for the European Championships in 1987, and business for national and international events took off. "The swimming community started to see that not only could we build the instatllation very quickly," McGrath says. "But our technology is at the highest levels."


http://www.mysuncoast.com/news/local/story/Sarasota-company-built-pools-for-London-Olympics/AAQAwesbYEa_QegHz04F_g.cspx

She has a very high power to weight ratio with large feet and hands. She did a 4:33 9 in a different pool 2 years ago, at age 14. Now a 4:31 3 after 2 more years of training and growth. Good for her!

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
68. I've had a few posters here argue with me about how it's sour grapes.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:46 PM
Jul 2012

My family is involved in swimming. A teammate of my child's swims AA times and she's only on the junior level. (Incredible-if puberty doesn't wreck havoc on her, as it sometimes does, I'll pass along her name. She's someone to watch.) A friend's child was at the US Trials.

This isn't sour grapes. No one loves to see records broken more than a swimmer. A new record gives them a goal to work towards. The problem is that we have so many now are creating newer and better juices that aren't detected at this time. Personally, I hope she did it legally-that's an incredibly exciting moment.

The suit ban was wonderful. I remember the day the decision was handed down quite well.

As to her form and turns-my kid watched the race and made a comment about how if she had made a turn like that at a meet she would stand a chance of being DQ'd. All you need is one judge and it's all over. I've watched events where the stroke was cleaner than what she put out yesterday and have watched the kid DQ'd for it.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
82. I am watching Faux, and they discussed this
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:15 PM
Jul 2012

The gist is that there are new and more sophisticated performance enhancing drugs and the Chinese apparently do research in this area (like we don't), this also means they are refined and may not be detected with the tests we have now. However, the urine is saved so it can continue to be tested.

Then they talked about genetic enhancement and how the girl has flippers for feet. No kidding, I guess she is 5'8" with size 10 feet, it can happen, but it isn't common. There was also further concern about Chinese training methods, basically if a child shows signs, that child is put into a camp and the training is grueling, they couldn't show the pictures, gasp.

So it was actually informative, but mildly xenophobic.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
52. Sometimes americans can be bad sports. Shame on trying to ruin a young girls reputation.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 01:40 PM
Jul 2012

I am in a China fan but the girl won fair and square and she beat the guy's time. I say be a good sport and stop harping and remember what the Olympics is suppose to be about.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
67. China has had problems with athletes doping
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:38 PM
Jul 2012

and it's within recent memory. It's not sour grapes but a bad reputation for the country involved.

It'll take a few years for China to get past its reputation.That's the way it goes, especially when you have swimmers who are still currently under suspension. Until then, they should just expect to have their wins be questioned. Australia went through it too and it's a black mark on their swimming record.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
69. Maybe so but it sure would have been nice if made his complaint to the officials in private.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jul 2012

It makes the americans look like sour grapes.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
80. "It makes the americans look like sour grapes."??? That doesn't make any sense.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:08 PM
Jul 2012

Sour grapes doesn't even fit this situation:

Driven by hunger, a fox tried to reach some grapes hanging high on the vine but was unable to, although he leaped with all his strength. As he went away, the fox remarked, 'Oh, you aren't even ripe yet! I don't need any sour grapes.' People who speak disparagingly of things that they cannot attain would do well to apply this story to themselves.
 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
89. Chill friend, it's just an expression. You are entitled to your opinion OK. Don't make a
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 09:28 AM
Aug 2012

mountain out of a mole hill. An expression.

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
84. There was an athlete pulled from Chinese Swim in June
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jul 2012

for testing positive. In June. It shows that they didn't even give a darn that they would be tested so close to the games-they still did it anyway.

If an American had pulled off the same accomplishment do you think there would have been a pat on the back and a hearty "Congrats!"? Nope. There would have been rampant speculation and I'd place China in the top three of countries filing complaints. And they would be public-very public.

This is the nature of sports. This is the nature of swimming. The swimming world is shockingly tight knit. Everyone on that level knows each other and anything out of the expected will be investigated to be sure that it was on the up-and-up. And it should be: every country cheats if they can get away with it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UK Olympic Chair announce...