General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI remember when the Olympic games were strictly for amateur athletes.
Pro athletes were barred.
When did that change?
Famous case : Jim Thorpe
James Francis "Jim" Thorpe (Sac and Fox (Sauk): Wa-Tho-Huk, translated to "Bright Path" [1] (May 28, 1888 March 28, 1953)[2] was an American athlete of mixed ancestry (Native American and Caucasian). Considered one of the most versatile athletes of modern sports, he won Olympic gold medals for the 1912 pentathlon and decathlon, played American football (collegiate and professional), and also played professional baseball and basketball.
He lost his Olympic titles after it was found he was paid for playing two seasons of semi-professional baseball before competing in the Olympics, thus violating the amateurism rules. In 1983, 30 years after his death, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) restored his Olympic medals.
Olympic committee voted to allow any athlete to enter. They said "all of the world's great male and female athletes". I think that's a shame. I don't watch basketball or tennis because it's filled with pros. That isn't interesting.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)They all just got done playing each other multiple times this summer.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)a basketball game finishing with a score of 145+ to 76? It's no fun.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)but that's it. Having millionaire pros playing is ridiculous.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)He was definitely the greatest athlete.
arbusto_baboso
(7,162 posts)Who exactly is paying the cash bonuses to the medal winners, and WHY? It makes an even bigger mockery of the olympics than they already were of themselves.
Mutt22
(76 posts)it was mainly the American athletes that were amateur, most of the others used professionals.
trof
(54,256 posts)Chinese too, I guess.
Not "pro" as we know it, but promising kids whose lives were pretty much taken over by the state and trained for the games. Winning medals was/is a big propaganda deal.
Mutt22
(76 posts)used the Red Army Hockey team. They are getting ready to show a segment on American athletes who do not go to a traditional school and/or are home schooled in order to train for their sport on our local news.
The whole argument about the purity of amateur sports is lost on me. College basketball and football are "amateur" sports. If those sports are refreshing compared to the Olympics then I'm missing something.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Only those who could afford it played in the games. If it was really about only the best,people would not be entered by country and their national anthem would not be played.
Angleae
(4,484 posts)Pierre de Coubertin, founder of the modern olympics, was a hardcore 1%er. He put that policy in so that the lower class couldn't afford to train enough to make the teams so that only the aristocrats could.
NoPasaran
(17,291 posts)Top hats and monocles, every one of them!
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)When the Olympics were first created, "Amateur" was a rich person w/ a lot of time on their hands. Poor did not have the time off or the money to be an "Amateur". That is still true, having only amateurs would largely feature those that can afford to be amateurs.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)1. Pros have NOTHING to prove.
2. It's more about ego than what the olympics REALLY stand for. Our basketball team is the worst in this because all they care about is more about triple doubles than just win the game.
3. Pro make bigger corporate olympic pawns than amateurs. Would you rather buy a box of Wheaties with Phelps on it or the Joe Schmo Public who won gold in team handball? I'll admit, it's very rare that an unknown darling becomes one.