Crassness personified...

[pbmus]

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

1. Oh good, so at least they're confirming she's as big a useless sack of pus as he is. nt

[uppityperson]

2. The message wasn't hidden but very obvious

[madaboutharry]

3. Why would she even own this jacket?

One would think that if you are the First Lady of the United States you would take a moment to say this to yourself: "Given the fact that people generally think my husband doesn't care about anyone but himself, maybe this jacket isn't such a good idea!"

Doesn't she have a staff to stop her from these unforced errors? Or maybe the Trumps just can't help themselves from trolling the entire country.

[underpants]

4. I was shocked it was only $39

but then look at the suits he wears

[flotsam]

7. This from a woman who's tampons are probably more expensive... N/T

[smirkymonkey]

9. The very best case scenario is that it shows VERY poor judgment.

I have a feeling that the message was more intentional that that.

[lunatica]

5. She doesn't need the jacket. We already know. n/t

[C_U_L8R]

6. It's not a hidden message... no

It's a freaking billboard of hate. She couldn't have said it louder and clearer if she had a megaphone.

[Wounded Bear]

8. Is she talking about these shoes?