Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 07:02 AM Aug 2012

Parents’ insurance covers children up to age 26 — but not for pregnancy

By Michelle Andrews, Published: August 6

The health-care overhaul provides a safety net for young adult children, who can now stay on their parents’ health plans until they reach age 26. But it doesn’t guarantee that their parents’ plan will cover a common medical condition that many young women face: pregnancy.

Group health plans with 15 or more workers are required to provide maternity benefits for employees and their spouses under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. But other dependents of employees aren’t covered by the law, so companies don’t have to provide maternity coverage for them.

Although hard numbers aren’t available on how many companies don’t provide dependent maternity benefits, “I would say it’s common,” says Dania Palanker, a senior health policy adviser at the National Women’s Law Center. And the number could grow with the recent expansion of coverage to children under age 26, she says.

more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/parents-insurance-covers-children-up-to-age-26--but-not-for-pregnancy/2012/08/06/2b59f160-6a2c-11e1-acc6-32fefc7ccd67_story.html

why aren't the fetus lovers up in arms about this, demanding that they get coverage?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Parents’ insurance covers children up to age 26 — but not for pregnancy (Original Post) n2doc Aug 2012 OP
fetus lovers? leftyohiolib Aug 2012 #1
They could more accurately be described as blastocyst lovers.. Fumesucker Aug 2012 #3
a sanitized version of baby.i think anti-abortion and anti-choice are 2 different things but thanks leftyohiolib Aug 2012 #4
insurance should not have any veto rights 2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #2
there's the death panel everyone was sooooo afraid of getting and we had it all along leftyohiolib Aug 2012 #5

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. They could more accurately be described as blastocyst lovers..
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 08:19 AM
Aug 2012

More commonly known as anti-abortion and often described here on DU as anti-choice..

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
4. a sanitized version of baby.i think anti-abortion and anti-choice are 2 different things but thanks
Wed Aug 8, 2012, 01:06 PM
Aug 2012

for the def

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
2. insurance should not have any veto rights
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 08:11 AM
Aug 2012

If you're covered, you're covered. No pick and choose.

Right now I have to contact my insurance to get an ok for a friggin xray. An x-ray! My doctor apparently is too stupid to know if I really need one or not and must contact my well informed insurance company to see if it is really needed.

The insurance company should not be able to pick and choose what treatments and diagnostics to use. If they are going to cover your female child on the parents policy, they need to cover her pregnancy as well as the new baby.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Parents’ insurance covers...