General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis must have caused apoplexy amongst the Florida wingnuts
A Tampa Bay Times Editorial
Numbers on health act debunk GOP claims
One of the chief Republican objections to health care reform is that it will add too much to the deficit and the nation can't afford it. The problem with this claim is that it's wrong. The Congressional Budget Office has consistently maintained that the Affordable Care Act reduces the deficit by tens of billions of dollars even as it extends health coverage to millions of Americans. Those who are calling for its repeal on the grounds of fiscal responsibility need to explain how they would do better.
The latest CBO estimate says the health care law will reduce the federal deficit by $109 billion over the next 10 years. The budget office factored in changes as a result of the recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court upholding the law but giving states flexibility to opt out of its Medicaid expansion provisions. The CBO estimates there will be 6 million fewer people insured under Medicaid, with half of those obtaining insurance on the new state exchanges, leading to a net reduction in cost to the federal government of $84 billion.
It also noted that it will cost the federal government about a third more per person to subsidize low-income people on the state exchanges than to provide them Medicaid coverage. But since fewer will be covered, there will be savings.
Republican leaders, such as House Republican Policy Committee chairman Tom Price of Georgia, say the law is unaffordable by noting that it requires public outlays of $1.7 trillion a number from the CBO analysis. But he and others conveniently disregard the other side of the ledger where the law balances expenditures through cost controls, new taxes, penalties and fees. As the CBO has repeatedly found, overall there is a net savings to taxpayers. The Affordable Care Act is a deficit-reduction measure.
more
http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/editorials/numbers-on-health-act-debunk-gop-claims/1244046
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)Any explanation they might offer will almost certainly be more lies......It's what they do best...
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)Most of their beliefs are built on a foundation of lies, so they're not going to ponder anything that might cause their house of delusion to come crashing down.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)in order to save money. My teabagger sister just told me this yesterday, since her husband needs shoulder surgery. They're now scaring all the boomers into believing that the "death panels" are only the tip of the iceburg.
These people are fucking NUTS!
n2doc
Interesting, this is the opposite of what a right winger I know have told me...
Diclotican
Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)You assume right wingers are honest folks interested in facts..Your first mistake. . Dont you remember Jim DeMint of SC saying they wanted to make health care Obamas Waterloo? And Mitch McConnell saying their first priority was to insure that black man in the White House did not get a second term? And Boss Limbaugh saying he wanted Obama to fail?
You really think facts like these are going to mean anything to these clowns?? Opps!! I mean these "folks"?
n2doc
(47,953 posts)I just assumed anything positive about "Obamacare" that appears in that part of the world will cause conniption fits. Haven't looked at the letters to the paper, I'll bet there are some doozys coming.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Of course, this may be a good part of why reTHUGs are really against it.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)FLyellowdog
(4,276 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 7, 2012, 05:54 PM - Edit history (1)
1...that the Republicans can read
and
2...that they can understand what they've just read.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)why the fuck would they care about this?