Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
1. With plastic barrels, I doubt it.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:47 PM
Jul 2018

I see few purposes. Cheap guns that can be used for murder and thrown away, and guns that can be made/acquired by people who are not legally allowed to have guns guns due to reasons like felony records.

I see no stopping it, though. The printers exist and once something is on the Internet, it's there accessible forever.

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
5. I'm not familiar with Trump's position.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:51 PM
Jul 2018

It the Democrats are against them and the NRA supports it, I suppose that's all he cares about.

lame54

(35,293 posts)
6. Would the bullets have a trace of plastic?...
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:52 PM
Jul 2018

That won't identify a particular gun but it will tell that it came from a plastic gun

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
11. This is new to me and I have done little research.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 11:00 PM
Jul 2018

I would assume forensics could determine a plastic gun was used. But that is it. The guns would be cheap to make they would probably be tossed/destroyed after used in a crime, and since
the barrel is plastic it probably won't leave the same markings for each shot. So even if they did find the particular gun used, there could issues with it being admitted as evidence.

Oneironaut

(5,501 posts)
2. The bullets themselves would not be plastic.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:49 PM
Jul 2018

It's just the guns. Plastic bullets are actually used in non-lethal crowd control. I believe they would use normal bullets.

jpak

(41,758 posts)
7. So, there would be no unique rifling marks on the bullets?
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:52 PM
Jul 2018

Untraceable guns AND expended bullets?

Who knew?

DetroitLegalBeagle

(1,923 posts)
16. Ballistic tracing in real life is pretty hit or miss
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 11:17 PM
Jul 2018

Its not like what you see on TV or movies. Only full metal jacket rounds generally survive intact enough to detect enough rifling to match to a gun. Hollow points, which is what most people use in handguns, expand, deform, and usually break apart into small pieces, making rifling mark detection difficult.

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
8. The firing pin and bullet would be metal.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:54 PM
Jul 2018

However, one could probably sneak a small pin and bullet past a metal detector/security guard much easier than a gun made of metal.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
10. The bullets are regular bullets.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:59 PM
Jul 2018

If the barrel is 3D printed, it may still have rifling (or it could be smooth, which would be less accurate). Whether the plastic would imprint on the bullet or not, I have no idea. In general, they are one use only. The gunpowder pretty much destroys the plastic internals after the first shot.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
13. This whole thing is a canard to distract from the real issues
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 11:14 PM
Jul 2018

Granted, 3D printed guns are bullshit and should not be allowed.

But with our current gun laws any criminal can buy a gun anytime they want and a gun show. And 3-D printers are expensive.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do plastic gun bullets ha...