Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:10 AM Aug 2018

Seditious Conspiracy

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115

<snip>
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Maraya1969

(22,483 posts)
1. This is stealing the election and Russia's help in order to help them afterward
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:16 AM
Aug 2018
or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States

2naSalit

(86,647 posts)
2. The term
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:19 AM
Aug 2018

"by force" could be a point of contention in a legal argument but I agree that this is pertinent.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
3. I agree.
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:27 AM
Aug 2018

How should we interpret "by force"? Would that be by military or police force only? Or could it be by political means?

2naSalit

(86,647 posts)
5. Yeah, I've been contemplating that too
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:31 AM
Aug 2018

I think the argument could be made that since it was a computer based attack that nobody was able to stop, that might be a determining factor, not sure though.

Johnyawl

(3,205 posts)
6. I think that since the attack on our election was aided...
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 10:17 AM
Aug 2018

..by the Russian Military Intelligence that it could be considered "by force".

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
8. The Founders never anticipated non-kinetic military "force" could cause more damage than cannonballs
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 10:57 AM
Aug 2018

So I agree with you Johnny

slumcamper

(1,606 posts)
7. Bundys at Malheur springs to mind
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 10:27 AM
Aug 2018

With chief sedition officer in power, aided and abetted by a spineless GOP-led Congress, the legal consequences of seditious conspiracy seem to be moot.

N_E_1 for Tennis

(9,734 posts)
4. Thought experiment...
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:29 AM
Aug 2018

How about threatening to “Shut down the government”?

Could be construed as conspiring to “put down” the government.

Could be “by force” if the person issuing the threat is the “most powerful person in the world”.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
10. I think everyone is trying to define what laws have been broken.
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 11:30 AM
Aug 2018

Some call it treason, but we are not in a declared war. In the law above, "by force" is used in every instance.

It does seem like some sort of betrayal or sedition but lawyers will probably settle for obstruction of justice and abuse of power?

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
11. personally, I think tRump jr will get charged with lying
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 11:42 AM
Aug 2018

to investigators. tRump himself may get charged with obstruction at the very least though we know he is guilty of more crimes.

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
14. My fellow Democrats:
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 12:03 PM
Aug 2018

You are so brilliant on civil rights and terrible at physics! Electricity is a force. Forced entry into a server is an illegal use of force. To make illegal copies of keys, whether of a metallic or electronic/silicon variety, then use that to enter property on US soil is an invasion – ESPECIALLY if the co-conspirator is the military of an enemy nation.

20 years for each and every person connected with this conspiracy to work with the military establishment of one of our worst enemies for 60+ years to undermine the THE VERY CORE of our nation: free and fair elections.

In the Art of War, Sun Tzu points out that the best general achieves his/her objectives with the least expenditure of energy, thus preserving the nation's strength for future conflicts. Cyber Warfare IS warfare, and it's applied precisely for these reasons. 21st century warfare is being committed right now by all the major nations, including the US. The last thing any of those nations want is one of their own citizens conspiring with one of their enemies to make their attack even more efficient. This is 21st century aggression pure and simple.

And keep in mind that Trump is not just undermining the US, but also NATO, international protections against climate change and an anti-nuclear treaty with Iran. Trump is softening up the entire planet to benefit an enemy of the United States.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seditious Conspiracy