Ex-Watergate Prosecutor Says Proof Of Trump's Guilt Is Staring Us Right In The Face

[guillaumeb]

From the article:

Speaking of Trump,

The bottom line is he wants to meet with Mueller just like he wants to go in for a root canal. There’s no way he wants to do that. He knows that he can’t go in. If he was really innocent and he really had nothing to hide, he would have gone in there a long time ago. What he has done is not the actions of somebody who is innocent and someone who has nothing to hide. He has done everything he can up to this point to avoid having to talk about this at all with the prosecutors.

To read more:

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/08/02/proof-of-trumps-guilt-nick-akerman.html

If one takes the position that Trump is a crook who is financially controlled by Russia, most of what has been revealed makes sense.

[dem4decades]

1. You should say it's Nick, though Jill had probably said it too.

[guillaumeb]

2. If people read the article it is clear.

It is really common sense, in my view, but everything points to Trump being guilty and nothing exculpatory has been shown at this point.

[triron]

3. I like Akerman

[malaise]

4. Duh!

But remember Putin didn't want him to win.

[guillaumeb]

5. How could I have forgotten? eom

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

6. Seems obvious.