Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 09:19 PM Sep 2018

David Frum: Delay the Kavanaugh Vote

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/09/kavanaugh/570409/

Delay the Kavanaugh Vote
This Senate is singularly ill-equipped to assess the allegations against Trump’s Supreme Court nominee.
4:28 PM ET
David Frum
Staff writer at The Atlantic
This post was updated on September 16 at 5:56pm.

snip//

These surprise allegations against Kavanaugh are now to be assessed by people pre-committed to dismissing such allegations as irrelevant to public office. Kavanaugh is a Supreme Court nominee because Donald Trump is president. And what is alleged against Kavanaugh that President Trump has not already confessed?

You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. … Grab ‘em by the pussy. You can do anything.


The Kavanaugh nomination will now be assessed by people all of whom voted for the presidential candidate who confessed to grabbing women. But “assessed” is the wrong word. On present indications, the allegations against Kavanaugh will not to be assessed in any meaningful sense at all. But “assessed” is the wrong word. They are not going to be assessed in any meaningful sense of that word. The Senate Judiciary Committee has already released a statement dismissing the allegations as unworthy of further attention, and in fact, as an abuse of the hearing process. The candidate has been vetted, there is nothing more to learn or say.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” So said Mitch McConnell about the Merrick Garland nomination nine months before the 2016 elections. It’s now less than eight weeks to elections that may remake the Senate. What’s the case that this group of men should be the one to speak for the American people about this nomination?

It will be not be easy to ascertain what happened all those years ago. It will not be much easier to judge the relevance of those events, whatever they were, to a confirmation vote 36 years later. But we can judge the judges—and they are the wrong men in the wrong job at the wrong time. This vote should be delayed until more facts are in, and until a broader public has made its voice heard.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Frum: Delay the Kavanaugh Vote (Original Post) babylonsister Sep 2018 OP
Trump and Kavanaugh. Two dicks in a pod. dchill Sep 2018 #1
Of course delay. What's the hurry? Sneederbunk Sep 2018 #2
K&R smirkymonkey Sep 2018 #3
If you want a man who figuratively rapes women... Girard442 Sep 2018 #4

Girard442

(6,070 posts)
4. If you want a man who figuratively rapes women...
Sun Sep 16, 2018, 11:06 PM
Sep 2018

...what better choice than a man who literally rapes women?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Frum: Delay the K...