General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBSdetect
(8,998 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)peekaloo
(22,977 posts)His smug mug was profiled on '60 Minutes' awhile back and he was so proud of how "a conservative beat the leftist social media at their own game". Knee deep in Farcebook's shenanigans, too. For the record it was noted that the Clinton campaign was offered the same "assistance" from FakeBook but refused.
Grasswire2
(13,569 posts)triron
(22,003 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)the Mercers go down.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)And broke.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)Like Parscale has done. I would not be surprised if we find that he worked with the Russians on the campaign? He knows a lot about their computer programs.
Izzy Blue
(282 posts)"Brad Parscale is linked to a data firm that has become a focus of the Trump-Russia investigation."
Feb.2018
snip:
How does Parscale figure into all this?
"Jared Kushner hired Cambridge Analytica to take over the Trump campaigns data operations in 2016. Kushner also hired Parscale to develop the campaigns online microtargeting strategy.
According to the New York Timess Nicholas Confessore and Danny Hakim, Cambridge Analytica convinced Parscale to try out the firm. The decision was encouraged by Trumps campaign manager at the time, Steve Bannon, who was also a former vice president of Cambridge Analytica.
We dont know how instrumental Cambridge was to Parscales online strategy, but it seems reasonable to assume that it was important. Although Parscale denied during his 60 Minutes interview that the firm was useful, we know that the campaigns digital operation was extraordinarily effective.
The Guardians Carole Cadwalladr reported that Trumps campaign was using 40-50,000 variants of ads every day that were continuously measuring responses and then adapting and evolving based on that response. These ads were spread primarily through bots on social media platforms.
During that same 60 Minutes interview, Parscale insisted that allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia were a joke. But theres a mountain of circumstantial evidence that suggests otherwise, and if it turns out that the Trump campaign did help Russia target voters, well likely hear more about Cambridge Analytica and Parscales role.
It may turn out that Parscale did nothing wrong and had no connections to Russias disinformation campaign. But his proximity to all of this makes him an unusual choice to lead Trumps 2020 reelection campaign".
https://www.vox.com/2018/2/27/17058208/brad-parscale-trump-campaign-russia-cambridge-analytica