General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen the Constitution was written down, humans and human judges only lived to age 37
When the Constitution was written down, humans and human judges only lived to age 37....might be time for a change in term limits...as in 2018 most of us eke out a few years beyond 37.
JHB
(37,160 posts)where does that number come from?
Life expectancy numbers were lower because of the deaths from childhood diseases. For people who lived to adulthood and had enough wealth that they Could stay fed and didn't spend their days at backbreaking labor, they usually lived to ages more familiar to us.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)Famously both dying on the 50th Anniversary of the Declaration.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)The infant and childhood mortality rates back then were high. If you made it out of childhood you had a good chance at living a long life.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)last nite's show
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Average life expectancy was low because of very high childhood mortality. If you lived past 10, you could expect to likely make it to the late 50s at least, with many still achieving old age.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)If you want to think about how age affected adults in past times, look for a "life expectancy at age X" figure, not "life expectancy at birth". If it's about term limits on judges, then the relevant statistic would be something like "at 40", or whatever the youngest age you reasonably think they might start.
For instance, here is a table of how many more years a 21 year old English aristocrat could expect to live - in the 1700-45 period, it was another 43 years, ie to 64 (which is, I reckon, comparable to an American lawyer at the end of that century). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T4DLK7zLxYMC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false . Someone who survived to 40 would have an expectancy beyond 64.
But if anyone really wants to make this kind of argument, they should look for the most relevant statistics possible.
VOX
(22,976 posts)George Washington, 67, who succumbed to a throat infection. Although your correct, the average life expectancy c. 1776 was 36-37. The founding fathers had some good luck and good immune systems.
Back then, so many medical situations that could become fatal quickly are now controlled or eradicated today: smallpox, measles, diphtheria, strep throat, any bacterial infection, childbirth complications, various cancers, etc. All doctors could do was bleed their patients and fuss about some.
Not the best time to be alive.
Oneironaut
(5,495 posts)People who werent killed by diseases, etc. could expect to live full lives. The numbers were skewed by infant mortality mostly, as well as deaths from diseases, etc.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)Vinca
(50,271 posts)It would make sense to have ten year terms, with 2 terms ending during any presidential term. It would avoid packing the court. The SCOTUS should be representative of all the people, not 30% of the people.
onenote
(42,703 posts)For example, judges to the Supreme Court of the UK, judges to the French Courts of Cassation, the high courts in Italy, etc all have life tenure.
The procedures for getting appointed vary widely as do the powers of high court judges in other countries. The process by which a life tenured justice can be removed also vary, but there are no term limits in these and many other countries. (One exception: Israel, where judges must retire at age 70).
At the state level in the United States, a mandatory retirement age of 70 or 75 is not uncommon. However, retired judges often continue to sit on cases as the need arises. And a number of states with mandatory retirement ages for judges are considering raising or even eliminating those limits.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)talking about this. I remembered him saying what I wrote, but you obviously know what you're talking about.
Jim__
(14,076 posts)This chart is for England and Wales, but Europeans in North America should be comparable. And, yes, it looks like life expectancy at birth was around 37 then - but that's misleading:
snowybirdie
(5,227 posts)is affected by the high numbers of infant deaths which brought down age statistics. Actually many lived into their 60s and 70s.
onenote
(42,703 posts)and, on average, the first nine lived almost 70 years. These are folks appointed to the Court in around 1790-1791.