Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerica Magazine, a Catholic Jesuit Publication, rescinds endorsement of Kavanaugh.
Dr. Christine Blasey Fords testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee today clearly demonstrated both the seriousness of her allegation of assault by Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh and the stakes of this question for the whole country. Judge Kavanaugh denied the accusation and emphasized in his testimony that the opposition of Democratic senators to his nomination and their consequent willingness to attack him was established long before Dr. Blaseys allegation was known.
Evaluating the credibility of these competing accounts is a question about which people of good will can and do disagree. The editors of this review have no special insight into who is telling the truth. If Dr. Blaseys allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaughs denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaughs name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.
If this were a question of establishing Judge Kavanaughs legal or moral responsibility for the assault described by Dr. Blasey, then far more stringent standards of proof would apply. His presumption of innocence might settle the matter in his favor, absent further investigation and new evidence. But the question is not solely about Judge Kavanaughs responsibility, nor is it any longer primarily about his qualifications. Rather it is about the prudence of his nomination and potential confirmation. In addition to being a fight over policy issues, which it already was, his nomination has also become a referendum on how to address allegations of sexual assault.
Somewhere in the distant past, at least before the word Borked was coined to describe a Supreme Court nomination defeated by ideological opposition, Senate confirmation hearings might have focused on evaluating a nominees judicial character or qualifications as a legal thinker. But that time is long past. Many cases decided by the Supreme Court itself and thus also presidential nominations to that body (and the Senate hearings that follow) are now thoroughly engaged in deciding policy by other means. Neither the country nor the court are well served by this arrangement, but refusing to recognize it does nothing to help reverse it.
Evaluating the credibility of these competing accounts is a question about which people of good will can and do disagree. The editors of this review have no special insight into who is telling the truth. If Dr. Blaseys allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaughs denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaughs name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.
If this were a question of establishing Judge Kavanaughs legal or moral responsibility for the assault described by Dr. Blasey, then far more stringent standards of proof would apply. His presumption of innocence might settle the matter in his favor, absent further investigation and new evidence. But the question is not solely about Judge Kavanaughs responsibility, nor is it any longer primarily about his qualifications. Rather it is about the prudence of his nomination and potential confirmation. In addition to being a fight over policy issues, which it already was, his nomination has also become a referendum on how to address allegations of sexual assault.
Somewhere in the distant past, at least before the word Borked was coined to describe a Supreme Court nomination defeated by ideological opposition, Senate confirmation hearings might have focused on evaluating a nominees judicial character or qualifications as a legal thinker. But that time is long past. Many cases decided by the Supreme Court itself and thus also presidential nominations to that body (and the Senate hearings that follow) are now thoroughly engaged in deciding policy by other means. Neither the country nor the court are well served by this arrangement, but refusing to recognize it does nothing to help reverse it.
https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/09/27/editors-it-time-kavanaugh-nomination-be-withdrawn
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1193 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (29)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
America Magazine, a Catholic Jesuit Publication, rescinds endorsement of Kavanaugh. (Original Post)
JHan
Sep 2018
OP
Cha
(297,220 posts)1. Yes! Thank You, JH..
JHan
(10,173 posts)2. We just might see increased pressure for his name to be withdrawn over the weekend.
Cha
(297,220 posts)6. We wish.. trump, lindsey, and the goPutins
are determined to push him through so they can take over the world.
But, forever hopeful!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)10. IF we make it to the weekend.
RestoreAmerica2020
(3,435 posts)8. Pic needs to be Time magazine cover with caption LLORON!
[Lloron:damn cry baby!]
treestar
(82,383 posts)3. IMO his demeanor today
Was enough by itself. Lack of judicial temperament under pressure.
eleny
(46,166 posts)4. Wow, that's a slap in his face
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)5. Kavanaugh's response: Cancel My Subscription! nt
BigmanPigman
(51,591 posts)9. The American Bar Assoc
and his own religious group(Jesuits) have demanded FBI investigations but I doubt the Senate GOP Judic. Comm members will do anything but push him through faster to avoid more groups calling for an investigation and women coming out. We need to call the senators like crazy tomorrow.
DC Senate directory (202)224-3121. RESISTANCE IS PATRIOTISM!
demmiblue
(36,851 posts)11. Well worth the read. K&R!
oasis
(49,383 posts)12. KAVA....NO. Please NO!