Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Alhena

(3,030 posts)
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 11:12 PM Sep 2018

So Murkowski was a "yes" before the ABA called for an FBI investigation

That was what jumped out at me from the Wall Street Journal "no plan B" article. The White House felt it was all set before the ABA wrote their letter (bravo for them).

If so, it all comes down to whether conservative Christopher Wray's FBI finds corroboration in a week's investigation. Wray clerked for Mike Luttig- a very conservative (former) appellate judge. Which probably means that Wray cares a lot about the Supreme Court being conservative.

I guess "hope for the best and expect the worst" applies to this situation, but it's better than what we faced last night.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
1. Article says she "remained" undecided by Friday morning
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 11:17 PM
Sep 2018

"Ms. Murkowski said Friday morning before the Senate committee vote that she remained undecided on the nomination. "

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/kavanaugh/card/1538166098

She was undecided before the letter from the ABA and she still was undecided the following morning.

Kaleva

(36,298 posts)
4. WH might have felt good about it but a "yes" vote from her wasn't a sure thing.
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 11:24 PM
Sep 2018

The ABA letter certainly kept her in the undecided camp.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
5. And how did that feeling work out when they failed (yet again) to repeal the ACA?
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 11:47 PM
Sep 2018

You assume the Trump administration knows anything. They are the Keystone Kops.

hlthe2b

(102,236 posts)
7. OR more likely they thought they didn't need her vote. It takes two R no votes to derail.
Sat Sep 29, 2018, 08:49 AM
Sep 2018

I can't read the behind paywall WSJ article, but EVERYTHING I have seen and read and heard makes it clear that Murkowski (far more than Collins) is a high probability no vote--but officially remains undecided. I think the statement that she was going to vote "yes" is incredibly unfounded.

BlueSpot

(855 posts)
6. If all we have is a scrap of hope
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 11:58 PM
Sep 2018

I'll take the scrap of hope. We're better off today then we thought we were yesterday. Let's don't forget that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Murkowski was a "yes" ...