Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 3959 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (65)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Adam Schiff: They call this transparency (Original Post)
dajoki
Sep 2018
OP
Make sure we use power ruthlessly to destroy all those gop fuckers once and for all
BSdetect
Sep 2018
#1
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)1. Make sure we use power ruthlessly to destroy all those gop fuckers once and for all
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)9. Absolutely
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)2. All that testimony, nothing burger to feed Fox. Sad!
dem4decades
(11,288 posts)3. Why can't Mueller subpoena that?
Wounded Bear
(58,653 posts)5. He can, but not for the House committee...
They have their own power of subpoena, that the Repubs chose not to invoke.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)12. But can't he do it for his investagtion?
Wounded Bear
(58,653 posts)13. Yes, of course, assuming he can prove relevance...
Mueller has done a lot of things we don't know about. The leak resistance of his staff has been remarkable.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)14. I think it is relevant n/t
Wounded Bear
(58,653 posts)4. Can't wait til he's the chair of that committee...
Repubs better watch their pasty, criminal asses.
pecosbob
(7,538 posts)8. Now we'll see some actual 'angry Democrats.'
certainot
(9,090 posts)10. can they do same with this limited kavanaugh 'investigation'?
who get first access to the 'limited' info? and what can they do to it before the fence sitters see it?
NCjack
(10,279 posts)11. Republicans are showing us how DEMs are permitted to treat them. nt