How to Watch Julie Swetnick Interview Online 8PM ET /PT tonight- please post if you are watching!

[Amaryllis]

Please start a thread and post comments if you are watching!


https://heavy.com/entertainment/2018/09/watch-julie-swetnick-interview-online/

Julie Swetnick, the third woman to raise sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, will speak publicly Sunday night in an interview with John Heilemann on The Circus.

The interview will be part of a 30-minute episode, which airs Sunday, September 30, at 8 p.m. ET/PT and will be broadcast on Showtime. If you don’t have cable or can’t get to a TV, you can watch a live stream of the show (or DVR it, or watch it on-demand) on your computer, phone or streaming device by signing up for one of the following cable-free, live-TV streaming services.

[procon]

1. Over hyped with maybe a minute interview on an airport concourse.

She said nothing new that hasn't been aired before.

[Separation]

4. Yup

I sure do bet that Amazon Prime and Showtime got a bunch of new signups though, so it was a win-win for them at least.

[Amaryllis]

5. You mean that clip in the airpost that they were using as promo is the entire thing? SEriously?

This does nothing for either her or Avenatti's credibility. It weakens it seriously.

[MountCleaners]

9. Yeah, that was pretty much it

Big bunch of nothing. Avenatti said he was going to take it to the media...where is it??

[targetpractice]

2. I signed up for a Hulu Showtime trial just to watch...

Did I miss something? Because I watched the episode, and the interview was less than a minute while Swetnick and Avenatti were trying to catch a flight in an airport... I didn't hear or see anything we don't already know other than on camera face time for Swetnick. She seemed sincere and credible.

That said, I liked the episode and it was great to see Alex Wagner again.

[jberryhill]

23. "Did I miss something?"

No. If it got you to sign up, you didn't miss a thing.

[Hoyt]

3. Unless you got a kick out of Geraldo's Capone Vault, don't waste your time.

I saw better summaries on MSNBC Friday night. That is all this was, with a little screen time for Avenatti to tell us how great he is.

Ms. Swetnick answered 3 questions from earlier in week. Said pretty much what she stated in her statement. Nothing new.

Avenatti is playing this (go ahead and bash me). I was disappointed and think it’s probably best if FBI does not interview her, because they might conclude it is questionable whether she has anything to add, which will taint Ms. Ford's and Rameriz's story. Possibly Avenatti told her to say nothing of substance, but why even agree to appear in that case.

Plus, the producers of the show and advertising must be the same group that worked with Geraldo on Capone’s vault.

[Amaryllis]

6. Maybe the Dems were right that Avenatti is making it worse, not better.

[Hoyt]

7. Just getting ready to add something like that. It didn't help and Showtime deserves criticism.

[Amaryllis]

10. I have to say I kinda wondered why she chose Avenatti as her lawyer, compareed to the ones that

Ford chose. He's been great with Stormy but he is a grandstander.

[Trust Buster]

26. This

[Amaryllis]

11. THat clip has been up for several days and is the one they have beeen using for promo. Not new.

[femmedem]

12. Deleted. Thanks. n/t

[nocoincidences]

13. I watched and there was NOTHING new.

No interview with Swetnick.

WTF

[Amaryllis]

14. Does not reflect well on Avenatti. Sure looks like bait and switch.

[rzemanfl]

15. Why doesn't anyone think Avenatti and his client are the ones who were had?

Let's watch the news in the coming week and see where this goes.

[Amaryllis]

16. Good point! Thank you. We may have jumped to conclusions too quickly. There has certainly

been more than once where someone was scheduled for 60 Minutes and at the last minute was cancelled because it was too politically volatile. I personally know someone this happened to who was high up in politics. Then there was the movie called The Insider, about Jeffrey Wygant who was a whistleblower on the tobacco industry - true story- who was dropped from 60 Minutes at the last minute. RAchel had Avenatti o talking about this and I can't imagine she would not have vetted it carefully first, even tho she said NBC had not yet vetted it.

[rzemanfl]

17. I think they agreed to an "exclusive" and Avenatti thought "Showtime" was like MSNBC.

Premium channels are different. They ran with an airport interview, for whatever reason. Let's watch the news and see what happens.

[Amaryllis]

18. I've been hoping Rachel or Lawrence might have her on tomorrow. I trust their vetting.

[rzemanfl]

19. There is also he fact that everything has been going a zillion miles an hour and in umpteen

directions at once. What may have looked smart on one day looks stupid the next. I am so sick of this shit show. I suspect the Statute of Limitation ran on everything that happened in Maryland when Kav was in high school. I can't get a clear answer to that from anyone. No one has directly said there was no Statute of Limitation on rape in Maryland in the early '80s. There was one on attempted rape then and it was only a year.

[Amaryllis]

20. I've read a number of places that there isnt a statute of limitation on rape/sexual assault in MD

and I think heard it said on MSNBC but not sure; too much too fast like you said.

[john657]

24. Unless this allegation happened before 1992, then it was still

a misdemeanor in MD with a SoL of 1 year.

[rzemanfl]

25. Good morning. There isn't now but I haven't seen anyone say there wasnt't then.

I find it hard to believe that there was none in the '80s. If there was and has run the public is being played. MSNBC's legal analyst is one of the people who has said "no Statute of Limitation." This is remarkable legal laziness. There is a difference between "is" and "was." The U.S. Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws.

[redstateblues]

21. Could't they get it on a major network?

[Amaryllis]

22. Doubt it. GAng rapes, etc. Would be much easier on cable. Also network is less willing to stick

their necks out.

[still_one]

27. Sorry, but unless this is broadcast through a major network which everyone can access without

signing up for a subscription, it means very little