Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 02:00 AM Oct 2018

Didn't we have to get rid of President Clinton because of "the children"?

How the hell are we going to explain to The Children that we're actually considering putting on the Supreme Court of the United States a man who thought that vodka enemas were a good way to get drunk?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Didn't we have to get rid of President Clinton because of "the children"? (Original Post) jmowreader Oct 2018 OP
"The children" are of little interest to the Trump party. SamKnause Oct 2018 #1
i think one reason Kavanaugh was so interested in Clinton/Lewinsky thing was that it was consensual JI7 Oct 2018 #2
And with Clinton/Lewinsky, neither one of them had to be drunk before sexy time! betsuni Oct 2018 #3
Not at all jmowreader Oct 2018 #4

JI7

(89,249 posts)
2. i think one reason Kavanaugh was so interested in Clinton/Lewinsky thing was that it was consensual
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 02:10 AM
Oct 2018

the thought of a woman wanting to have sex just because she is into a guy was not something he had ever experienced .

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
4. Not at all
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 02:19 AM
Oct 2018

Kavanaugh was interested in the Clinton-Lewinsky thing because Kavanaugh is a bully, and wanted to watch them squirm in their seats.

Trump may be interested in Kavanaugh because Kavanaugh is one of the few people in America who's as big an asshole as Donald Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Didn't we have to get rid...