Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,832 posts)
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:27 AM Oct 2018

Rachel Mitchell is now earning her fee for speaking for republican 'men'

after asking eleven questions she's ready to pass judgement on Dr. Ford (she asked two questions of kavanaugh, but had no opinion)

Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh

Washington (CNN)In a memorandum to Republican senators, Rachel Mitchell says a "reasonable prosecutor" would not bring a case against Brett Kavanaugh based on Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault allegation given the evidence presented to the Judiciary Committee.

But Mitchell, the sex crimes prosecutor hired by Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans who questioned Ford last Thursday, also notes, "A Senate confirmation hearing is not a trial, especially not a prosecution."

Mitchell cites inconsistencies in Ford's statements to the committee, The Washington Post, and her therapist about the alleged assault, which Ford alleges took place when she and Kavanaugh were in high school.

Mitchell also notes the lack of corroboration of Ford's account, including recalling details that could back her story.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/30/politics/rachel-mitchell-kavanaugh-ford/index.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
1. Doesn't she have something better to do?
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:29 AM
Oct 2018

Like handling the backlog of rape cases she's responsible for?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. Give her credit for stating the obvious too many did not grasp, including the media in their rush to
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:34 AM
Oct 2018

have a TV crime trial, not a boring trial of character.

"But Mitchell, the sex crimes prosecutor hired by Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans who questioned Ford last Thursday, also notes, "A Senate confirmation hearing is not a trial, especially not a prosecution.""

Now that should be the headline.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
3. The hearing was not a criminal trial?! Duh! Did she say that in front of the committee?
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:32 AM
Oct 2018

That would have blown the whole Kangaroo Court up from the get go and not at the end.

Also, real crime nail investigations occur firs by real investigators, not Congressional staffers, then the indictment, not the other way around, usually!

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
5. It was designed to be a bag job all along.
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:37 AM
Oct 2018

She had no intention of validating Dr. Ford's allegation. She was there to break her down, and when she did not, she put on her cloak of prosecutor to cast aspersions.

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
7. All she needed to say was "The Statute of Limitation for attempted rape prosecutions in
Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:49 AM
Oct 2018

Maryland ran over three decades ago." I will say "shill" rather than some "w" word.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Mitchell is now ea...