Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,655 posts)
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 07:55 PM Oct 2018

Why Forecasts May Be Underestimating Democrats

Why Forecasts May Be Underestimating Democrats

https://politicalwire.com/2018/10/20/why-forecasts-may-be-underestimating-democrats/

October 20, 2018 at 2:44 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 

"SNIP.......

Nate Silver: “The fundraising numbers are so good for Democrats — and so bad for Republicans — that it’s hard to know quite what to make of them. From a modeling standpoint, we’re extrapolating from years in which fundraising was relatively even, or from when one party had a modest edge, into an environment where Democrats suddenly have a 2-1 advantage in fundraising in competitive races. Moreover, this edge comes despite the fact that a large number of these competitive races feature Republican incumbents (incumbents usually have an easier time raising money than challengers) and that most of them are in red terrain.”

“If Democrats beat their projections on Nov. 6 — say, they win 63 House seats, equalling the number that Republicans won in 2010, an unlikely-but-not-impossible scenario — we may look back on these fundraising numbers as the canary in the coal mine.”

“That data, plus Democrats’ very strong performances in special elections, could look like tangible signs of a Democratic turnout surge that pollsters and pundits perhaps won’t have paid enough attention to. Right now, in fact, the polls are not showing a Democratic turnout advantage.”

......SNIP"

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Forecasts May Be Underestimating Democrats (Original Post) applegrove Oct 2018 OP
My hunch is,Silver is onto something. Wellstone ruled Oct 2018 #1
Another instance where Silver says it could be huge for the Democrats or not. redstateblues Oct 2018 #2
Agree. He likes to "hedge his bets." Va Lefty Oct 2018 #4
Nailed it! bronxiteforever Oct 2018 #5
1) Nate isn't "betting" 2) Nate is clear that nobody knows what will happen CreekDog Oct 2018 #6
My son and I both were called by Beto phone bankers today Gothmog Oct 2018 #3
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. My hunch is,Silver is onto something.
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 08:00 PM
Oct 2018

Noticed a couple weeks back,his statements suggested the Polls are not counting something and he mentioned the same scenerio about the Mid-Terms.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
2. Another instance where Silver says it could be huge for the Democrats or not.
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 08:04 PM
Oct 2018

Always hedging his bet so he can say "I was right" no matter what happens

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
6. 1) Nate isn't "betting" 2) Nate is clear that nobody knows what will happen
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 09:12 PM
Oct 2018

because statistical predictions are not *knowledge".

just because you're willing to say you're sure what will or won't happen doesn't make you correct.

Gothmog

(145,231 posts)
3. My son and I both were called by Beto phone bankers today
Sat Oct 20, 2018, 08:18 PM
Oct 2018

My son and I both got calls today from a Beto phone banker. I had a Democratic block walker hit my house last week.

I get robo calls but this was a nice phone banking call.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Forecasts May Be Unde...