Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 05:27 PM Nov 2018

Democrats rack up more gains in House as key tight races are called (+31 and may approach 40)

WASHINGTON — The House Democratic majority continued to grow Thursday as Rep. Karen Handel, the Republican who won a high-profile Georgia special election last year, conceded to challenger Lucy McBath, bringing the party's net gain of seats in Tuesday's midterm elections to 31.

That number could grow again in coming days as more outstanding races are called. Many analysts have estimated that the number will climb closer to 38 seats by the time all votes are counted, and a dozen competitive House contests remained too close to call by midday Thursday.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-rack-more-gains-house-key-tight-races-are-called-n934066?fbclid=IwAR0aul1NmaRcdz_CCBg-F7Ht23CBvE8iHZfh6nMANzzvX4JZpU9h9zO7E54

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

chillfactor

(7,575 posts)
2. If I remember correctly remember....
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 05:55 PM
Nov 2018

pre-election predictions said we would pick up between 30-40 seats. Looks like the prediction has been reached despite some pundits heads pooh-poohing that prediction!

John Fante

(3,479 posts)
3. 31 surpasses the total number of seats won in 2006.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 05:56 PM
Nov 2018

They won the the national popular vote by 8%. How big is that? If HRC had won the popular vote by a similar margin she would have finished with 68 million votes (Trump got 62.9 million). She would have cruised into the WH. 😔

If democrats can maintain this enthusiasm, they'll win the 2020 election with ease - they're simply the larger of the two parties. Republicans, who were just as fired up, got smoked.

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)
4. Yup, it's a good sign.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 06:12 PM
Nov 2018

There were posters here saying that if we got anything less than a 10 point margin, we wouldn’t win back the house. Uh huh.

David__77

(23,382 posts)
7. Wikipedia shows Democrats leading popular vote by 4.2%.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 06:33 PM
Nov 2018

I don't know if that's right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_2018

I imagine that will increase, in any case, because California has a lot of votes to count. If those numbers are right, then it took a lot of less than a 10% win to take the majority.

Response to John Fante (Reply #3)

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
10. But we can't count on independents slanting in our direction
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 06:45 PM
Nov 2018

That is always the key variable from midterm to incumbent re-election. Those swing independents tend to go against the new president's party in a midterm, but restore benefit of a doubt to him two years later.

It's the reason both parties are so often fooled. I was laughing at Republicans who were asking after the 2010 midterm what could possibly change in 2012? Many prior examples.

Trump's approval rating can't go any higher than it is now. I think we need an economic downturn to keep him at 44 or below.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
11. They will when Trump is just as crazy and the economy is growing at 1% or we are in a recession.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 06:50 PM
Nov 2018

Trump shot his wad with this tax cut. We will look back at the 2nd quarter of 2018 as the pinnacle of Trumponomics. This is setting up as a 1980 like situation with Trump being seen as an aberration that interrupted a succession of Democratic presidents.

John Fante

(3,479 posts)
14. Whoever asked what could change from 2010 to 2012 is a dumbass.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 07:18 PM
Nov 2018

The unemployment rate was in the 9-10% range at the time of the 2010 midterms - the economy had nowhere to go but up. Had it remained at 2010 levels, Romney would have likely won the 2012 election. Independents didn't give Obama the benefit of the doubt because he was the incumbent. He ended the War in Iraq, got OBL, and the economic picture improved.

Contrast that with Trump: he can't hope for a better picture in 2020 because this is as good as its going to get. The economy is on fire right now - it's at levels not seen since the late-90s. Unlike Obama in 2010, the economy has nowhere to go but down.

Truth is, Trump and the GOP had EVERYTHING going for them to retain the house: 3.7% unemployment, no unpopular wars. No nasty recession/recovery to climb out of, no badly mismanaged quagmires to answer for. Yet they lost the House, and it wasn't even close.

That's why I laugh at people who say Tuesday's election wasn't a repudiation of Trump. He's arguably the sole reason they lost the house and failed to pick up 6-8 seats in the senate.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
8. She would have won by that amount had it not been for James Comey's repeated interference.
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 06:34 PM
Nov 2018

He handed that election to the Republicans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats rack up more ga...