General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAOC is not who you may think she is...
Should Leader Pelosi become the next Speaker of the House, we need to tell her that weve got her back in showing and pursuing the most progressive energy agenda that this country has ever seen.
And
She supports Pelosis bid for Speaker. AOC believes in a progressive agenda, just like Pelosi.
Be proud of these new leaders and support them. They are the future of our Party. We need everyone. Stop buying the bullshit from rightwing media sources.
Sorry its Twitter but its a good read if you can (follow the whole thread):
Link to tweet
?s=21

demmiblue
(38,255 posts)angrychair
(10,566 posts)I try looking but I miss stuff...thanks!
demmiblue
(38,255 posts)I search before I post, but sometimes miss things as well (especially tweet-related).
Some people can't even bother to look halfway down the page.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,038 posts)We aint paying by the pixels.
Plus yours was more succinct.
KandR
FSogol
(47,301 posts)
LakeArenal
(29,941 posts)She also gives plenty advice on how we run our campaigns and platform.
We call her McLump
Stellar
(5,644 posts)She (and other Conservatives) always telling Dems that they shouldn't run too far to the left. But then they have all of those bat-shit crazy candidates running way over to the right. What's up with that?
LakeArenal
(29,941 posts)bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)If the GOP can dictate what is allowed in a campaign and who is allowed to cast a vote, they have a decent chance of winning.
The funny thing is that even when they get away with that kind of control, their policies and attitudes still make them vulnerable to any district that isn't 75% brain dead.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)nykym
(3,063 posts)stop letting repugs and conservs create the narrative.
We should correct their false narrative with our own and change the direction.
When they say Entitlements we should counter with earned benefits and so on.
Stop trying to defend there buzz words, create our own and correct anyone who uses their talking points.
angrychair
(10,566 posts)I agree
aggiesal
(9,972 posts)When I hear someone tell me about "Regulations",
I say "Don't you mean PROTECTIONS?"
One person I know, keeps saying "There are too many regulations".
Again, I counter " Don't you mean, that there are to many protections? The more the merrier."
Tom Rinaldo
(23,094 posts)I suspect that some people here have a hard time accepting that she began her rise in politics by organizing for Bernie Sanders. Get over it. Others got their rise by organizing for Hillary Clinton. It's great that they got involved, it's great that they stayed active, it's great that so many of our future leaders got elected to Congress in 2018. AOC is a strong Democratic Latina voice emerging from a younger generation. She, and others like her, are to be celebrated.
Nictuku
(4,178 posts)Some people here at DU jump on anything they can to diss Bernie Sanders, or anyone who had anything to do with him.
I'm sick of it. It turns me waaaaaay off to even continue to read here. Talk about a circular shooting gallery.
We need every damn Senator who caucuses with the Democrats. We will even need some Republicans (one can hope)
I was a Bernie Supporter, but (OMG) I voted for Hillary in 2016 Presidential election. But I feel insulted every time I see another huge as thread of why Bernie is so awful.
I also support Pelosi for Speaker. We need her experience in the House, especially for the term that is coming up.
For 2020: I really really really hope that neither Bernie or Hillary decides to run. Clearly both of them cause a huge split within the Democratic party. We don't need that. Divided we fall.
I've never posted anything whatsoever against Hillary, but boy have I read dozens (maybe hundreds) against Bernie.
I'm telling you, it turns me off.
Autumn
(47,737 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 15, 2018, 05:53 PM - Edit history (1)

NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
The old saying is "people are judged by the company they keep" (not who endorses them) but leaving that axiom aside for a moment... I think her critics are smarter and more reflective and more analytical than you're giving them credit for. Fair-minded and rational people here are perfectly capable of (and appear to have so done) judging someone based on their words and deeds, their mistakes, their failures, their missteps. Also based on whether or not someone is humble and learns from their mistakes and how/if they turn those experiences into success. What I'm trying to point out is that not everything in the world circles back to Bernie and it appears to me that she's being evaluated and measured based on her own merits, not his. That's all.
George II
(67,782 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Personally I think it's a bit strange because Sharice Davids is one of the most exciting and inspirational and motivating candidates to come along in a long time. I'm so very impressed with her and the way she approached her campaign, and how she's handled her victory. She's humble and goes forward into the job with humility and giving the JOB all the respect and attention it deserves. She's doesn't seek attention by courting controversy.
All I'm trying to say here is that I really-really like her. I see great things in her future. Kansas is lucky to have her, and the entire freshmen class of the House is lucky to have her as a role model.
sheshe2
(91,597 posts)The post you responded to was edited.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
sheshe2
(91,597 posts)Just wanted to give you a heads up.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
sheshe2
(91,597 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)You know the one.
THAT PICTURE!
Autumn
(47,737 posts)We need to impeach her!
SARCASM! just in case.
seaglass
(8,182 posts)Autumn
(47,737 posts)seaglass
(8,182 posts)
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Hopefully things change as we get closer to 2020.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,428 posts)Its like watching us do the GOPs dirty work. And you're right, even candidates that he has endorsed or worked with get tarred with this irrational hatred. Bernie is supposed to be granted the same respect as official Ds as far as DU rules, and I am frankly flabbergasted at how much some get away with bad-mouthing him. He came in second behind Biden, just recently, in Democrats support for running if he did. Even if someone, for reasons I can only guess, despise the man, at least hold your tongue while he energizes and attracts new voters.
I also think Bernie or Hillary should not run. Same reason I think Pelosi should retire at some point soon. Maybe you are right that this is not the best time though, but thats for another thread. We need to show the American public that we are the party of the future. We are. But saying it and looking like it are two different things.
Eric J in MN
(35,621 posts)...for Pelosi no matter who (if anyone) runs against her.
Autumn
(47,737 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,621 posts)...she was asked in an interview if shell vote for Pelosi and said shed like to see other choices.
Autumn
(47,737 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)kcr
(15,522 posts)Doesn't everyone know about those? Why is she so misunderstood?
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)and said you should try to understand what you are talking about before you spout off like a little tea pot:
Nancy Pelosi
?
Verified account
@NancyPelosi
Nov 13
More
We welcome the presence of these activists, and we strongly urge the Capitol Police to allow them to continue to organize and participate in our democracy.
Link to tweet
klook
(13,172 posts)Progressive activism is one of Democrats' core values.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)and it seems Leader(soon to be Speaker) Pelosi does too.
kcr
(15,522 posts)Have them arrested? This is exactly how I expect someone with experience would handle this. Nancy Pelosi knows exactly what she's doing and it's why she isn't going anywhere. Sorry.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)you shit on them. You are not very good at following her lead. I know she isn't going anywhere and I'm not sorry.
kcr
(15,522 posts)In fact, I think it shits on them to minimize their efforts by refusing to acknowledge their protest to protect Ocasio Cortez. A sit-in is a protest. But this is nothing new. She's always so misunderstood. She never means what she says, or her actions are never interpreted the right way. And now, a protest isn't really a protest. it was support! If I'd been at that sit-in, I would have been pissed.
George II
(67,782 posts)....if they called to tell her about it she probably would have told them that what the were demonstrating for had already been decided by Pelosi five days earlier and the wheels were already in motion.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)knew in advance, meaning there is a 50/50 chance that she did. Then you take your amazing prognostication skills to new heights with evidence free speculation of what soon-to-be Speaker Pelosi would have told them. Truly you have no need of other people you can clearly make up whole conversations with zero outside input. I'll leave you to your company.
George II
(67,782 posts)....as for your other snarky comment - do you know what "probably" means? That means it's not definite but possible.
However, if the conversation DID happen and the subject of the committee came up (since it was a major reason for the sit-in), it's a good bet that Pelosi mentioned that she'd already decided (almost a week earlier) to reinstate the committee. It wasn't a classified secret.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)pure and simple. Who cares what the Nancy Peolsi in your head might have said?
Autumn
(47,737 posts)that she was still with them and to tell them they needed to show Nancy that they had her back if she was elected Speaker. Good for AOC and Nancy.
George II
(67,782 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)others. Congresswoman-elect Ocasio's own change in attitude suggested in this tweet is what I've hoped would start happening when she actually became acquainted with our house leaders. We'll see how she comes along. Just the beginning of a big, big learning curve.
malthaussen
(18,080 posts)... thanks.
-- Mal
iluvtennis
(21,167 posts)malthaussen
(18,080 posts)Firstly, it validates their bullshit, and secondly, makes the Democrats turn on each other.
-- Mal
watoos
(7,142 posts)I could not agree with you more.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)correct the narrative. Twitter, locl ppers, Facebook etc.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Making a mountain out of a mole hill. That there is controversy over Nancy Pelosi becoming the next Speaker is a right wing talking point. The right is afraid of Pelosi. Go Get em Nancy.
IronLionZion
(48,604 posts)I hate how liberals are so easily divided by complete BS from conservatives.
TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)Clearly, AOC is new and has not yet "concretized" her ppatform. First she says Pelosi has to go, now she supports her.
AOC's opinions should be regarded with some skepticism...
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)Pelosi has to go? Link or go home.
Autumn
(47,737 posts)TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)Autumn
(47,737 posts)group wanting Nancys gone. She told them at the protest they needed to show Nancy they had her back. Does that sound like she wants her gone?
Link to tweet
TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)My whole point was that she has changed her mind, which is clear.
Autumn
(47,737 posts)TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)"Though many of the candidates lost, a handful of incoming members, including Jason Crow of Colorado, Jahana Hayes of Connecticut and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, have called for a new generation of leadership. "
Autumn
(47,737 posts)An article lumping her in with other people and saying that they have called for new leadership isn't proof of her saying that. I have not found anything like that since she was elected.
Saying months ago that she would like to see different choices during a campaign before she's even elected is not saying Nancy needs to go. That's looking at options.
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)Your opening salvo:
First she says Pelosi has to go, now she supports her.All that you have produced an article that has no quotes from Ocasio-Cortez saying she won't support Pelosi.
Autumn
(47,737 posts)on that.
HootieMcBoob
(3,830 posts)
ismnotwasm
(42,635 posts)A very junior member of Congress who has to deal with populist expectationssome of them her own-while learning and doing the actual work of a Representative. She will make mistakes. She will do things right. She has potential to be a change agent. The operative word being potential. I hope she understands this.
My Rep is also a Bernie endorsed person, who fights all the fucking time for immigrants and immigrant rights. She is fearless. She fiercely advocates. She wins my heart right there, no matter I dont agree with every single thing.
AOC is not my Rep. Kinda tired of hearing about her. I do look forward to seeing her in action in Congress.
Silver1
(721 posts)It cuts through so much confusion. I feel really good about the energy of the newly elected Democrats. And I think there is a very good chance they'll bring many working people on board for 2020.
Great response from Pelosi about climate change. This is an absolutely urgent issue.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Nancy Pelosi is reelected every two years. And if you paid attention to what she did the last time she was Speaker you would know why she should be Speaker again.
We dont need a freshman rep like AOC to tell us what Pelosis positives are.
GWC58
(2,678 posts)Hillary has put up with for OVER 30+ years. Please people stop believing these wingnuts. I can see why rethugs dont like Nancy. Why are we falling for this crap? Stop doing it, please!