Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,945 posts)
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 09:10 PM Nov 2018

White House will not seek to revoke CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press pass

The White House will not seek to again revoke CNN chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta’s hard pass, as first reported on Monday by Fox News' John Roberts.

“Today the White House fully restored Jim Acosta's press pass. As a result, our lawsuit is no longer necessary. We look forward to continuing to cover the White House,” CNN said in a statement.

Acosta was spotted at the White House moments after CNN issued its statement. It was widely believed earlier on Monday that the White House would again attempt to ban Acosta from the White House after legal threats were exchanged in a series of emails and court filings.

Acosta’s "hard pass," which provides expedited access to the White House grounds, was suspended earlier this month after he engaged in a contentious back-and-forth with Trump during a Nov. 7 press conference. Acosta then refused to pass the microphone to a female White House aide and there was brief contact between the two. His hard pass was revoked later that day and CNN argued that it violated the network and Acosta’s First and Fifth Amendment rights.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly temporarily restored Acosta’s credential. Later in the day, the White House sent the CNN reporter a letter informing him that a “preliminary decision” was made that his credential would be revoked, once again, after the temporary 14-day order expires.

The attorney for CNN and Acosta claimed in a Monday court filing that the White House was attempting to punish Acosta based on “retroactive” application of rules that aren’t written and requested a hearing for the week of Nov. 26. The request for an emergency hearing is now a moot point, as the White House will not seek to keep Acosta from covering President Trump.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-will-not-seek-to-revoke-cnn-reporter-jim-acostas-press-pass/ar-BBPTa7Y?li=BBnb7Kz

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House will not seek to revoke CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press pass (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2018 OP
Keep the lawsuit cooking Just a Weirdo Nov 2018 #1
I'm frankly surprised at this Bradshaw3 Nov 2018 #2
Easier to change the rules Awsi Dooger Nov 2018 #4
drumpf was probably told to consider himself lucky the WH won't be sued for libel Takket Nov 2018 #3
 

Just a Weirdo

(488 posts)
1. Keep the lawsuit cooking
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 09:14 PM
Nov 2018

Get the WH to pay for damages and take it out of Trumps assets not the taxpayers. Both actual and punitive.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
4. Easier to change the rules
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 11:12 PM
Nov 2018

Only one question and then dodge anything Acosta asks

That way you avoid the blame but nothing changes

Wait until you see some of the meandering answers to Acosta questions. Also some short dismissive ones

Takket

(21,563 posts)
3. drumpf was probably told to consider himself lucky the WH won't be sued for libel
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 10:56 PM
Nov 2018

for claiming acosta "put his hands on" the intern when there was literal video evidence otherwise.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House will not seek...