Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAvenatti now representing Chalupa
This should get interesting:
Michael Avenatti
I am now representing Alexandra Chalupa in connection with investigating and pursuing possible legal claims against Manafort, Trump and other affiliated individuals. She was targeted with baseless, bogus allegations, all designed to distract away from Trumps Russian collusion.
I am now representing Alexandra Chalupa in connection with investigating and pursuing possible legal claims against Manafort, Trump and other affiliated individuals. She was targeted with baseless, bogus allegations, all designed to distract away from Trumps Russian collusion.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2087 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Avenatti now representing Chalupa (Original Post)
manor321
Dec 2018
OP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,833 posts)1. Who is Alexandra Chalupa?
Isn't a chalupa a food, a thing kind of like a taco?
WhiteTara
(29,722 posts)2. My first thought
What does a flat taco have going against it? I kind of like them.
blitzen
(4,572 posts)3. Well, Rice is a food--and a name n/t
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)4. It's in the Vox article. She was attacked in connection with Hillary Clinton.
Second, Manafort counseled the White House to allege albeit with no evidence to back up said charges that the pro-Western Ukrainian government had colluded with the Democratic National Committee to try to help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 presidential election. A source with direct knowledge of the matter told me that the White House adopted Manaforts recommendation in the summer of 2017 to specifically target Alexandra Chalupa, a political strategist and consultant for the DNC, for allegedly working with Ukrainian officials to hurt Trumps candidacy. Despite a torrent of allegations, no evidence has surfaced that Chalupa or the DNC did anything wrong.
Acting on Manaforts advice, on July 10, 2017, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders encouraged reporters to investigate how the Democrat National Committee coordinated opposition research directly with the Ukrainian Embassy. That same week, Fox Newss Sean Hannity amplified the allegations evening after evening on his show. Likewise, Republicans on Capitol Hill called for investigations of the Ukrainian matter. On July 25, 2017, Trump tweeted: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump campaign quietly working to boost Clinton. So where is the investigation A.G.
On August 9, 2017, Matthew Whitaker (now the acting attorney general) and a conservative advocacy group he then headed, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), formally asked the Federal Election Commission to investigate the DNCs dealings with Chalupa. The complaint was largely based on scant evidence and erroneous information; the FEC has given no indication since that it will investigate the matter further.
Even though the allegations had no factual basis to prove anything improper, they were effective propaganda. The White House made its claims shortly after the first public disclosures that Donald Trump Jr. had hosted a Trump Tower meeting between a self-described intermediary for the Russian Federation and himself, Jared Kushner, and Manafort, in which the Russians promised dirt on Clinton. The White House was attempting to draw a parallel between its meetings with foreigners and the DNCs via Chalupa.
Acting on Manaforts advice, on July 10, 2017, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders encouraged reporters to investigate how the Democrat National Committee coordinated opposition research directly with the Ukrainian Embassy. That same week, Fox Newss Sean Hannity amplified the allegations evening after evening on his show. Likewise, Republicans on Capitol Hill called for investigations of the Ukrainian matter. On July 25, 2017, Trump tweeted: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump campaign quietly working to boost Clinton. So where is the investigation A.G.
On August 9, 2017, Matthew Whitaker (now the acting attorney general) and a conservative advocacy group he then headed, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), formally asked the Federal Election Commission to investigate the DNCs dealings with Chalupa. The complaint was largely based on scant evidence and erroneous information; the FEC has given no indication since that it will investigate the matter further.
Even though the allegations had no factual basis to prove anything improper, they were effective propaganda. The White House made its claims shortly after the first public disclosures that Donald Trump Jr. had hosted a Trump Tower meeting between a self-described intermediary for the Russian Federation and himself, Jared Kushner, and Manafort, in which the Russians promised dirt on Clinton. The White House was attempting to draw a parallel between its meetings with foreigners and the DNCs via Chalupa.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)5. Good. I wish Avenatti and Chalupa great success. n/t