General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI do not know why we do not do this
I am a former Republican. I left the party in 2012, but never removed my name from their mailing list. Every two or three days I get an email from "President Trump" telling me what is going on, defending himself, or asking my opinion. They never ask for money. I also get letters from the RNC which ask for money but they are never from trump himself (although some are signed by his son). I understand these are not real letters from the president, but they are designed to make me think they are. They are designed to make me feel I am part of his movement and my opinions are valued, not my money. EVERY letter, in whatever form, that I receive from Democrats is a fund raising letter that makes me feel valued only for my money. We should learn something from the Republicans. Information only emails cost nothing, they do not have to pay for themselves. Use them.
violetpastille
(1,483 posts)Also, Congratulations!
allgood33
(1,584 posts)You are so right. And most of our Democrats on Twitter will not even open their accounts for private notifications. If you want to tell them something without the world seeing it it can't be done. At least Perez has opened his notifications and I have received feedback from him but this is his Twitter account...does not ID as DNC.
FSogol
(45,678 posts)is reply to a fundraising email template with your noble musings.
Stop ripping the Democrats. Go to your local Democratic Party office and volunteer to help if your opinions are so necessary.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)FSogol
(45,678 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)than to actually go out and do the work.
FSogol
(45,678 posts)Report: Russia still using social media to roil US politics
And the campaign didnt end with Trumps ascent to the White House. Troll farms are still working to stoke racial and political passions in America at a time of high political discord.
The two studies are the most comprehensive picture yet of the Russian interference campaigns on American social media. They add to the portrait investigators have been building since 2017 on Russias influence though Trump has equivocated on whether the interference actually happened.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/russia-social-media-influence-efforts-ongoing-report-says/2018/12/17/936dad56-0272-11e9-958c-0a601226ff6b_story.html?utm_term=.f799e3912b50
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)NEW voters and voters in "dangerous" precincts/districts/states should REGISTER AS REPUBLICANS
If republicans are in charge of registering/providing machines, ballots, polling places, it is practically an imperative to BE a republican (if you do not want to be purged/harassed/etc..
We need an army of "infiltrators"...if for no other reason than to confuse republicans
pnwmom
(109,051 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)in crucial states, which is best?
getting to choose a candidate or having your name on the roster when the election rolls around?
Stealthy is sometimes the best choice..
FM123
(10,056 posts)I was just thinking that in states like Georgia where the vote purge & suppression were just over and beyond - it might have helped in getting the wonderful Stacey Abrams elected...
Sneederbunk
(14,383 posts)NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)not the big tent general party
dubyadiprecession
(5,836 posts)Didnt have its people walking precincts and polling democratic voters in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania?
NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)I do not know why she advertised on Politico instead of PCH which has free games and prizes and others like it, which attracts a lot of low information voters, and those who do not give a damn except every four years when they vote for their team. Trump was there !!
I do not know why her slogan was "I'm with her" instead of something like "Make America Great Again." The election was not about her. It was about making peoples lives better.
I do not understand why she spent millions of dollars telling people how bad a role model Donald Trump was for their children. Those who cared knew it already. She should have spent those millions telling people how she helped people in the past and how her programs would help people in the future.
And what was she thinking when she said Trump supporters were a basket of deplorables. She could never win back the border-line Trump supporters because she judged them and the real deplorables wore the term as a badge of honor.
She was the most experienced and qualified person to ever run for president. But that also labeled her as a member of the establishment and one of the elite and her campaign did nothing to vanquish that impression. The voters were in no mood for that in those areas devastated by a changing economy, which they blamed on the elites.
So we ended up with the orange turd.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)In fact, the Dems had one of the most robust canvassing efforts in history in 2016. A lack of canvassing wasn't the problem.
Did you do any canvassing?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)They are all informative with any donations being optional.
I see nothing wrong with Democrats asking for donations since they dont get as much as the Republicans get from organizations like the NRA, the Kock brothers, the 1%, and Russia and other foreign countries.
AJT
(5,240 posts)deep pocketed donors that the repubs have, but you still need to connect to people, not just play the money card.
NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)but do not make people think it is the only reason you are contacting them. see my answer below
NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)Making people think they are part of the process is the most valuable thing any political party can have
brooklynite
(95,420 posts)DNC has done the same from President Obama, President Clinton, etc.
NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)If they did was it two or three times a week. Was it a us approach without asking for money. Show people their opinion is important, not the money. Make them feel they are part of the process, that is what Trump does. This is why his followers are so loyal. When we attack him they feel we are attacking them.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)and they do need money. You need money to run. That's another factor for Prez in 2020...who can rake in the money????
NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)as an excuse to ask for money. I guess because Trump goes where the winds of his supporters take him, it is an in-depth survey with a lot of open-ended questions. Trump is not a leader, he is a follower and a salesman. It never asks for money.
pecosbob
(7,604 posts)Be careful not to appear as if you are criticizing Dems. Just a heads up.
NO TO FASCISM
(40 posts)Self-examination is one of the most important activities a person can engage in. The same thing is true for any smart organization, including a political party. Otherwise, you are stuck in the mud and can not move forward towards your goal.
Crunchy Frog
(26,751 posts)I think constructive criticism and self examination are incredibly important.
Unfortunately, in the past couple of years on this site, the general view seems to have taken hold that criticism is the same as "attacking", or even that there's no such thing as criticism that's constructive.
I do hope you'll stick around here, because I think your perspective is a valuable one. It will certainly not be welcomed in all quarters here though.
OnDoutside
(19,999 posts)a good debate about these things too, but there are posters here who have a heightened wariness of new members, and will alert at the drop of a hat. In fairness to them, some have come through years of online shitfests and attacks, so I get that.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,453 posts)Republicans are rolling in dough from the likes of Koch brothers, Adelson, Putin and his oligarchs. The only thing they need from the base is loyalty. Blind, jingoistic, loyalty. So, "free" emails: Lock her up, build the wall, MAGA!
Dems need every sawbuck they can glean from workers.
ooky
(8,975 posts)I find it encouraging each time I meet someone who has rejected the Republican's assault on our democracy.
ecstatic
(32,909 posts)That's why we don't have a Rush Limbaugh equivalent on public radio, etc. Think about the level of gullibility required to believe anything trump says, either on Twitter or in an email that was clearly not written by him.
FSogol
(45,678 posts)Chap Peterson, Dave Marsden, Tim Kaine, Gerry Connolly, Mark Warner, Ralph Northam, Justin Fairfax, Sharon Bulova, Martin O'Malley, and Mark Herring. Why? Over the years, I've supported them and/or helped on their campaigns.