General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe skimming of food packaging is now industry wide.
Last edited Sun Jan 13, 2019, 12:06 PM - Edit history (1)
I posted this in the Lounge but was told it should be posted here so more people could see it.
This is something that others might find important especially to
to working families that find their wages are not stretching as far with their food shopping. The skimming of food packing is now industry wide and has even worked it's way into storage-brand packaging. I came across this FB page when I wrote a complaint to Florida Naturals who recently dropped their 64-ounce juices to 52 ounces but kept the same packaging and SAME PRICE so that most consumers wouldn't notice the change. It turns out that a lot of consumers noticed and are complaining but we seldom hear about it.
Here is the link so you can see what consumers are saying about these stealth changes.
https://www.facebook.com/pg/FloridasNatural/posts/?ref=page_internal
If the Admins think this post should be posted elsewhere please let me know.
BigmanPigman
(51,588 posts)and have always been on a tight budget (artist/teacher). It was first obvious in breakfast cereals.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)It's just that now it seems to be getting worse. There are now few alternatives to brand goods with less product and higher costs.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Many of them are better quality than the name brand. Oatmeal is one example. The instant. Store brand better than name..
There is one store, guess I better not name brands, but their store brands are a dollar or more cheaper. Bacon is one example. 2 full lbs., $5.39! Great quality. Limited selection. Great produce.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)And at stores like Aldi, often there's only one brand.
There are very few items in which the name brand is worth it.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)A dollar cheaper. Bermans.
Anyone know the owners of Aldi and Trader Joes are brothers?
allgood33
(1,584 posts)EW sought to get her favorite agency to look into this to see if any laws are on the books to prevent this kind of gouging of the necessity of food.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)12 ounces instead of 16. Candy, bacon, almost everything
BigmanPigman
(51,588 posts)True Blue American
(17,984 posts)First one I noticed. Ice Cream dropped. The containers are a little smaller.
BigmanPigman
(51,588 posts)The first one for me was candy bars. Halloween used to be great until the late 70s and candy shrunk.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)They've done marketing studies on this. People won't buy when the price goes up for the same size package, but they will buy a smaller package at the same price. Of course this doesn't fool everyone, but it does fool enough people to make it worth pissing off the rest.
davekriss
(4,616 posts)They are fooling many.
Hekate
(90,662 posts)dalton99a
(81,467 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 13, 2019, 12:18 PM - Edit history (5)
They've been doing it for years
But it's BIGGER!
edhopper
(33,575 posts)and price increase, chips have more than doubled in price.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)My husband was glad when stick deodorants went to 3 ounces...I think that's to comply with TSA regs, and was probably in response to customer requests. That extra 1/4 ounce in STICK DEODORANT was a pain when dealing with some "by-the-book" TSA agents.
Even when one could clearly see that only 1 ounce remained, the 3.25 ounces on the label meant it was a no-go. Same for toothpaste: a clearly used and rolled-up 5-ounce tube was nogo because it said FIVE ounces (even though it clearly only had 2 ounces inside)
Just doing their jobs, I guess.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)Some brands heavily stamp the papers and then roll loosely so that the packaging takes up the same amount of space as tightly wound brands and products. You go through them twice as fast because there is much less on the roll. Cat litter is another problem. The major brands dont last and have terrible quality, especially the "lighter" versions.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Look at your rollers. The roll is now an Inch shorter in width.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)When I do the shopping I always buy the thicker bounty or brawn because they last a week. I have a home office now and we definitely get more time with the large tightly would roll. I personally like the blue shop towels for cleaning but she thinks that's "gross" lol.
When we have the cheap overly patterned cheap brands, they dont last nearly as long. Its worse on the weekends with everyone home. Maybe a day.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)They will not fit on my ceramic rollers. too big.
Extra plush, but these do not seem to be like the others
Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)Just look at any older recipe that measures things by cans (and gives the volume).
One story about it from 2010 - as to tuna fish cans over a period of years (even though the physical size has remained the same (and although the price has risen over time, its rise doees not coincide with the can shrink. https://www.thedailybeast.com/tuna-shrinkage-cans-now-five-ounces-more-expensive.
I know tomato can sizes have also changed over the years, since the recipes I grew up with call for sizes that aren't made anymore.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Chunk Tuna is now shreds. You have to buy Land caught or Albacore. Anyone else noticed how the quality has deteriorated?
Nay
(12,051 posts)eat the Cadia brand from the health food store. I don't exactly know how they've ruined the taste, unless they are filling the cans with something like pigs' assholes.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)They ran out of Tuna.. Mush. Line and Polecaught is pretty good.. There are brands now that are Save the Seas, but I usually buy Albacore in water, not oil.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Here's just some of the products listed:
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/08/26/list-of-products-brands-that-tested-positive-for-monsantos-glyphosate/
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 13, 2019, 06:42 AM - Edit history (1)
I see 3 products in my pantry now. Others I have used frequently.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)so it would be seen by more. I don't get to the Lounge much and probably wouldn't have seen it.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)52 oz. Sneaky price raise.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)llmart
(15,536 posts)I remember when Breyers ice cream did that. I read labels carefully.
highmindedhavi
(355 posts)The price of cream went up so much that our company would have to raise prices or reduce the size. We reduced the size and all other brands followed.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)a bunch of years ago... Initially it happened during the fall/winter "holiday" season and then come January, the 5lb bags returned. Eventually they were permanently 4lb bags.
I chuckle about how way in the past, consumers had complained so much about boxes of cereal being bags of air, that the labels started stating that the product was being "measured by weight not volume" .
The 6oz cans of tuna became 5oz.
The 16oz box of some pastas became 13oz. or 14.5oz.
I have a can of Campbell's Manhattan Clam Chowder that is labeled with a net weight of "10 3/4oz". Really?
It does mess up recipes requiring cans of stuff now too...
Talitha
(6,582 posts)I noticed it when transferring the bag of sugar to my Tupperware canister.
The level seemed lower, so I read the label... 4 lbs.
I think they call it 'downsizing' but I call it what it is: just plain old sneaky.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)and if they had any more and she said that this is what they were sent because it was a popular size during the holidays for baking... or something to that effect.
Um really?
marybourg
(12,624 posts)beveeheart
(1,369 posts)Have to use 2 cans to do that today.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Fit to eat. Flake is now much, chunk flake.
BumRushDaShow
(128,905 posts)Gone are the days of the six-ounce can of tuna for $1tuna fish purveyors have been reducing their can size and upping their prices, leaving buyers and sandwich lovers outraged. William Sherman reports.
William Sherman
07.28.10 8:21 PM ET
This shrinkage has been going on for years and its outrageous, said Jane Fleetwood, a mother of two who lives in New York City. I remember when you could make three kids sandwiches from a can of tuna, but that was a while ago. Following the tuna can timeline, more than 10 years ago <ed., in 2000>, it came in seven-ounce cans, then were diminished to 6 ½ ounces, then 6 1/8, and now a flat five. Americans bought 1.5 billion cans of tuna last year, according to AC Nielsen data. Fish company spokeswomen said the most recent downsizing was due to rising prices for tuna, first canned in 1903, and competition, although it is unclear which company cut the can first in the most recent episode.
Pam Becker, a spokeswoman for Progresso, said, In order to better align to the current category package sizes, we did move to a five-ounce can for Progresso, making it easier for consumers to compare our brand with other national brands of the same size. Amanda Rozier, a spokeswoman for Chicken of the Sea said, Chicken of the Sea followed its competition and industry in the reduction of package sizes.
The tuna companies declined to discuss price, which for consumers varies from store to store. But Robert Ivers, vice president of Fairway Market, which annually sells more than 400,000 cans of tuna at its five stores in the New York City metropolitan area, said the canners all raised their prices over the last 18 months. They dropped the size and they raised the prices, and some of that increase we had to pass along, but not all, because weve decided to make smaller margins of profit, he said. A year ago we were selling Bumble Bee solid white for $1.25 a can; now its $1.66. Genova used to be $1.66 for a five-ounce can; now its $1.99, said Ivers.
Meanwhile, serving sizes on most producers cans are listed at two ounces, baffling some consumers, who find it hard to conceive of a two-ounce tuna sandwich. Its a double whammy for customers, said Ivers. I have a 9-year-old daughter and a 5-year-old son, so now what do I do? I put in extra mayonnaise. And, he noted, canned salmon is not exempt from the trend.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/tuna-shrinkage-cans-now-five-ounces-more-expensive
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)And I believe others did too
PaulX2
(2,032 posts)They are all in cahoots together.
Response to allgood33 (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)allgood33
(1,584 posts)as to what was happening. Everyone I ever stopped in a grocery store was surprised when they read the label on their favorite brand. The food industry gets away with this because they can' they know few consumers pay attention and hardly any complain to the industry. I want to motivate consumers to organize and protest what is happening in the food industry that people are unaware of. Regulations should require that new amounts of contents must be in totally new containers and not look like the packaging with higher amounts. There are no more 1/2 gallon anything. 12 oz has replaced a pound of bacon. 16 oz cans are now down to 11 or 12 ounces now.
There is no competition among and within the food industry. Store brands used to carry the full 1/2 gallons and 16 ounce pounds etc. This is no longer true. I want to fight for real competition in the food industry. There ought to be some entrepreneurs out there willing to provide consumers with standard weights and measures of food items and still maintain high quality foods. Food should actually be going down in price since fuel is going down and cheap labor of migrant workers was used during the last 30 years. Something is very wrong with this system and it is becoming unsustainable without lowering everyone's standard of living. The American dream is fast becoming a nightmare, not because of immigrants but because of greedy and corrupt oligarchs who who own and run our industries.
highplainsdem
(48,974 posts)ingredients, you'll often see that the size/weight mentioned doesn't begin to match what's sold now.
Nay
(12,051 posts)cookbooks. NO canned item called for in a recipe can be found today in the same size.
Grammy23
(5,810 posts)So it is subtle. It may register that the container is smaller like the ice cream or coffee container. But chances are good that at first you barely noticed. Eventually, it became obvious the container was smaller but they kind of snuck it in so it was gradual. Now that I know they are pulling shenanigans and slight of hand, I pay more attention. It just galls me that they keep shrinking my familiar coffee brand (Folgers Gourmet Blend) every few months, but the price never really shrinks with the container. If anything, the price per ounce goes up! And it seems like all of the brands are doing this...so changing brands is no solution. 😡
phylny
(8,380 posts)Now six in a package, used to be seven.
marybourg
(12,624 posts)phylny
(8,380 posts)Revanchist
(1,375 posts)And there's none in the all natural uncured variety
MontanaMama
(23,313 posts)and recipes will usually call for 8 ounces. You cant buy an 8 oz yogurt anymore. So, I buy the bigger container and can get a recipe or two out of it but theres always some left over. Frustrating.
erronis
(15,241 posts)I wonder why companies try to save pennies on the actual content.
Also, aren't we all supposed to cut down on our portions? Maybe it's being health conscious.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)so most don't complain because they don't know about it. Inflation is a marker for so many things in the economy, including wages and entitlements. If it is hidden, wages don't have to keep up and neither do benefits. Think about it.
mathematic
(1,439 posts)The BLS isn't so dumb that they can't figure a price per oz (or whatever the unit of measurement). Think about that.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)It's shrunk a good inch or so in size, so you have to use more and pay the same price.
mitch96
(13,895 posts)12 oz can is now 11.2 for the same price or more.... Hops are more expensive now don't cha know... Some foreign beers are still 12 oz though..
m
hunter
(38,311 posts)Most packaged foods are bad for you and the earth's natural environment anyways.
For example, there hasn't been any canned tuna or ice cream in our house for decades.
We do buy breakfast cereal at Costco, and half gallons of soy milk at the grocery store. No smaller packages there, and 20+ pound bags of brown rice and beans are always going to be a big, by definition.
keithbvadu2
(36,785 posts)Demovictory9
(32,453 posts)2naSalit
(86,577 posts)they all look like that! No matter what's in them.
enid602
(8,615 posts)I work in the Corporate Brands Department of the number 2 US grocery chain. I take calls all day long from seniors who actually count the number of beans in the can, and the number of sheets in a roll of toilet paper. And yet they ALL (at least the white ones) voted for and continue to support an ogre who gave a massive tax break to the rich that will cut revenues to such an extent that we will have REAL inflation, and the possibility of no/diluted SS and Medicare in the future. The Govt, of course just wont be able to afford these programs anymore. They deserve what theyll get.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)responsible or who is not being accountable. They believe that MAGA should mean that big business should get all the benefits because Trump said so. They do not realize that the food industry is big business that gets the tax breaks yet continues to skim them at the marketplace. Sad. i wish EW or AOC would speak out about this issue. I sent them both tweets and e-mails. It's hard to suggest anything to them when they do not open their twitter accounts to private messages.
True Blue American
(17,984 posts)Lb. Foolish.
keithbvadu2
(36,785 posts)Toilet paper sheets
Someone I know working in Dubai noticed that the tp rolls didn't seem to last as long.
The outer diameter of the roll was the same but comparing older to newer showed that the newer rolls had a larger diameter for the cardboard roll in the middle.
Mariana
(14,856 posts)I remember some years ago buying a new package of the very same brand and variety of toilet paper I already had, and I noticed the difference. Set on their ends side by side, the new rolls were a full 1/2 inch smaller than the old rolls. They had the same number of sheets, but the sheets were significantly smaller. I know they've made them smaller still since then.
Demovictory9
(32,453 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Cereal boxes, cracker boxes, and salad dressing bottles are getting thinner.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)Only Congress can really do anything about it. It used to be called "price fixing"
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)Most grocery stores line up all the brands together on one huge shelf and sometimes the only distinguishing feature is the price. Consumers usually go for the "cheapest" price taking no notice that one package is a different size, or features/quality may be different. When the brands are forced to complete on price alone, then the higher quality/higher priced brands will suffer.
All the brands and products are not the same, but few shoppers take the time to notice the differences. That's what the grocery stores want us to do! They want us to buy on price only, at least that's what they promote with their store policies. I see this practically everywhere except maybe the Dollar Store-type markets, but those aren't really groceries.
RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)BlueJac
(7,838 posts)my wife and I have noticed to price increase and the repackaging!
Rver
(97 posts)too. I started seeing it 6? Months ago. What I saw was 59 to 52 oz. OJ. A few years ago it was cherrios 14 to 12 oz. Same price now. Who do we complain to?
allgood33
(1,584 posts)least require the industry to stop the price fixing. I believe there is absolute collusion among them on the packaging and prices. They seem to stopping any products with the old traditional weights and measures in store brands.
SweetieD
(1,660 posts)Like they will add more water or filler so the weight looks the same but keep the same price.
keithbvadu2
(36,785 posts)I read years ago that sardines were packed very full in the can because they cost less than the oil filler.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,852 posts)has been aware of this for at least fifty years. It's just that different things get downsized at different times, so someone who never buys tuna would never notice that change.
I only buy solid white albacore tuna, and only that for years now. The other, cheaper kind, has never tasted good to me.
As for toilet paper, I've only bought Scott brand for a couple of decades now, when a fellow customer in a store pointed out to me how very much more tissue was on each roll of that brand compared to the other brands.
Disposable diapers suddenly started packaging significantly fewer diapers per container right around the time my youngest child was toilet trained. Haven't needed to buy diapers for about 30 years now, so I haven't a clue what they currently cost.
It's everywhere.
louis-t
(23,292 posts)The first time was with tea packaging. When contents went from 24 to 20 bags, overnight, industry-wide, I wrote a letter to Bigelow. Their response was pitiful: "Our customers told us they wanted more con-veeeeenient packaging." I laughed in the lady's face (over the phone). The next time was when tuna cans went from 7 oz. to 6.5 to 6 to 5 oz. I asked the people at StarKist how long they estimated it would be before we were buying 1 oz. cans. The response was "Oh sir, we took out mostly water."
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)I'm very happy to see more people finally waking up to this and complaining.
I get that companies need to make a profit but manufacturers pulling this sneaky as heck bull deserve to be called out. It's essentially deceitful and it messes up individual/family budgets as well as some recipes too.
keithbvadu2
(36,785 posts)Street vendors had a bag of socks, six pair in the bag.
They would sell the bag for a dollar but you had to really haggle.
Just not enough profit.
The next night, there were five pair in the bag and they were happy to sell for a buck.
Rome port visit trip. Stayed overnight hotel.
Noon meal, two liter bottle of soda, 1500 lira.
Next day, 1000 lira...... but one liter bottle.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)for instance.. I have a pumpkin bread recipe and every year I am pissed off because the recipe calls for TWO CUPS of canned pumpkin..
cans USED to be 16 oz (2 cups),.and a few years ago they changed it to 15 oz (some brands are 14.5)... so I have to buy TWO cans and throw away a lot or make an enormous batch with a larger can and a smaller can..
This year I used applesauce for the remaining ounce I was missing..
a "pound of bacon" is now anywhere from, 10 oz to 12
a "pound of coffee" is sometimes 11, 13 ounces
I sometimes use my grandmother's cookbook.. many of the recipes call for a #303 can or a #2 or a #10 can... youngsters have NO IDEA what that even means