Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems should counter propose on the wall (Original Post) TheHak Jan 2019 OP
Your username BumRushDaShow Jan 2019 #1
When I worked in media a "hack" was someone who wrote for pay. Jeffersons Ghost Jan 2019 #18
It was also slang for a cab driver. BumRushDaShow Jan 2019 #19
Nothing, zero until he put the gov't back to work. Then talk about shraby Jan 2019 #2
Offering a counter proposal legitimizes this tactic Salviati Jan 2019 #3
What corner? Trump has a long-standing modus operandi... JHB Jan 2019 #4
Open the government. Until then the shutdown is Trump's problem. He owns it. walkingman Jan 2019 #5
I would trade the wall for permanent protection for DACA Buckeyeblue Jan 2019 #6
Remember, Schumer made that offer... regnaD kciN Jan 2019 #15
You are right Buckeyeblue Jan 2019 #20
We don't negotiate with hostage takers. But thanks for playing. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2019 #7
If trump's offering a temporary fix for DACA and TPS YessirAtsaFact Jan 2019 #8
No. Negotiation should occur once government is reopened, and not before. David__77 Jan 2019 #9
Should have done that 2 weeks ago. Trump comes across as first to meet in middle. lancelyons Jan 2019 #10
Not to sensible people. Shrike47 Jan 2019 #12
Trump is betting that the SC ends DACA this fall, the only reason he offered a temp extension. Thomas Hurt Jan 2019 #11
Your first post in at least 90 days is to give him his wall?? Roland99 Jan 2019 #13
How much critical habitat will you trade Midnightwalk Jan 2019 #14
DACA isn't enough Takket Jan 2019 #16
So what kind of pizza do you like on weekends? irisblue Jan 2019 #17
You can't negotiate with someone Mr. Quackers Jan 2019 #21

Jeffersons Ghost

(15,235 posts)
18. When I worked in media a "hack" was someone who wrote for pay.
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 01:02 AM
Jan 2019

In a sense, I guess many of us were "hacks" back then.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
2. Nothing, zero until he put the gov't back to work. Then talk about
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:49 PM
Jan 2019

DACA and other particulars, but get the government up and running FIRST.

He's at war with his own country, using asylum seekers, DACA and government workers as hostages.

We shouldn't deal with terrorists.

Salviati

(6,009 posts)
3. Offering a counter proposal legitimizes this tactic
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:51 PM
Jan 2019

No negotiation until the government is open.

If it were a crisis, why didn't they do anything when they controlled all the levers of power?
Why did the senate pass a funding bill with no funding for the wall last month?

If it's not a crisis, why is he shutting down the government?

JHB

(37,166 posts)
4. What corner? Trump has a long-standing modus operandi...
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:53 PM
Jan 2019

Once he has what he wants, good luck trying to collect on what he promised.

The only deal you can make with Trump is one where you collect everything up front and anything else you can get later is just gravy. The situation with DACA does not fit that description.

Buckeyeblue

(5,505 posts)
6. I would trade the wall for permanent protection for DACA
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:57 PM
Jan 2019

Honestly, that would be huge. And the wall is never going to be built. But to trade a pipe dream for a real thing of protection...I think we should jump on that.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
15. Remember, Schumer made that offer...
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 11:05 PM
Jan 2019

...permanent DACA in exchange for full funding of the border wall (which was estimated to be $25 billion, not just the $5.7 billion at issue here). Personally, I thought Schumer was being far-too-generous with that offer -- it should have been not only DACA, but a comprehensive immigration solution that would provide a path to citizenship for undocumented residents, asylum-seekers, and family reunification -- but it doesn't matter, because Trump turned that far-too-generous offer down flat.

The fact is, he won't accept any solution that doesn't give him the opportunity to deport and lock out all the brown people, either now or, in the worst case, later. And he won't accept it because, while we could all have debates about the tangible positives and negatives of immigration, the bedrock appeal of Trump's policy isn't economics, crime, or justice. It's racism. He can't give a real inch on that, because his base wants the wall to make sure that white people like themselves continue to be in control. It's the reason that his so-called "border security" concerns include a wall with Mexico, but none with Canada. White people of northern European descent are welcome, anyone else is a danger to be kept out for our own survival. It's why he can't and won't accept a permanent DACA...and why we can't (and, hopefully, won't) accept a border wall.


Buckeyeblue

(5,505 posts)
20. You are right
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 09:33 AM
Jan 2019

I just wonder as the shutdown continues if 45 might be willing to give us anything we want as long as the wall is included.

I agree with your assessment about his immigration policy being more about racism than anything else.

I think all you have to do to stop most illegal immigration is hold businesses, farms and individuals who hire them to work accountable. At the same time make work Visas easy to get and make the process for an employer to check easy as well.

I, personally, am an open boarder advocate. Especially for neighboring countries.

David__77

(23,627 posts)
9. No. Negotiation should occur once government is reopened, and not before.
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 10:11 PM
Jan 2019

If they do what you recommend now, then the narrative might become "the Democrats are holding the government hostage for DACA" instead of "Trump is holding the government hostage for a wall."

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
14. How much critical habitat will you trade
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 11:03 PM
Jan 2019

The wall is stupid, ineffective and wasteful. The government is already waiving all environmental protection laws to build the current sections.

I could live with burning billions of dollars in exchange for something good. I don’t agree with negotiating with hostage takers. I don’t agree in any case we should allow any more walls built with waived environmental standards.

Takket

(21,702 posts)
16. DACA isn't enough
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 11:06 PM
Jan 2019

Permanent DACA

Amnesty and citizenship for any undocumented person who has a clean criminal record five years (years debatable)

full restoration of the ACA

Rollback of the tax scam bill

then MAYBE we can talk.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dems should counter propo...