Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SHRED

(28,136 posts) Fri Feb 8, 2019, 11:29 AM Feb 2019

Whitaker said he hasn't "interfered" with the SC investigations

This has to be looked into further.
Never take this asshole at his word.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Whitaker said he hasn't "interfered" with the SC investigations (Original Post) SHRED Feb 2019 OP

hasn't interfered? agingdem Feb 2019 #1

My immediate thought as well NewJeffCT Feb 2019 #2

Intel people have to duforsure Feb 2019 #3

Interfered is a judgement call. n/t CincyDem Feb 2019 #4

agingdem

(7,850 posts)

1. hasn't interfered?

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Fri Feb 8, 2019, 11:33 AM

Feb 2019

how about snitched?

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)

2. My immediate thought as well

Reply to agingdem (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 8, 2019, 11:34 AM

Feb 2019

sure, I didn't interfere, I just told Donny what was happening.

duforsure

(11,885 posts)

3. Intel people have to

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Fri Feb 8, 2019, 11:56 AM

Feb 2019

Have a smile on their faces after he claimed that. He'faces prison for lying, and they have everything that he and others have done. That could mean trump's AG could be in really deep legal trouble already. This guy doesn't strike me as very bright at all.

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)

4. Interfered is a judgement call. n/t

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Fri Feb 8, 2019, 12:11 PM

Feb 2019

Reply to this discussion