Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SoCalNative

(4,613 posts)
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 01:52 PM Feb 2019

U.S. Supreme Court blocks Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges

The U.S. Supreme Court has stopped a law that threatened to shutter Louisiana abortion clinics from taking effect this week, but the fight over whether abortion providers should be required to have admitting privileges at local hospitals is likely far from over.

In a brief late-night message Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the admitting privileges law be put on hold pending a "timely filing" of a petition for the high court to act on the law itself. It would immediately expire if that doesn't happen. If a timely petition is filed, then the stay remains in effect until the high court rules on the law.

The emergency stay was issued on a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts voting with the more liberal wing of the court – Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the newest member of the court who faced a rocky confirmation after President Donald Trump nominated him to replace the retiring Anthony Kennedy, wrote a dissent to the ruling that was more than 10 times longer than the majority remarks.

https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_342fd8ca-2b01-11e9-93dd-4bd3f7100d0e.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court blocks Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges (Original Post) SoCalNative Feb 2019 OP
Yes! Faux pas Feb 2019 #1
Justice Boof, of course, dissented gratuitous Feb 2019 #2
can that be made a special Justice Boof-only law? Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2019 #3
Justice Boof does have a personal record of irresponsible alcohol consumption gratuitous Feb 2019 #4
So he wanted to experiment by denying women their civil right? Buckeyeblue Feb 2019 #5

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. Justice Boof, of course, dissented
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 02:20 PM
Feb 2019

His rationale being that he wanted to see if the law would actually impede a woman's right to health care.

Next time Justice Boof goes to buy beer (he likes beer, and has so testified under oath), I hope he's carded. Then I want the clerk to tell Boof that his driver's license isn't good enough, and sends him away to get better ID. Then, when he comes back with more ID, the clerk should say he'll need an independent witness to attest that he's the person belonging to the ID. Then, after a sworn statement, Boof has to sit through a video produced by the Temperance League that tells him all about the dangers of alcohol consumption, including graphic footage of a liver destroyed by alcohol, the various cancers and tumors that can develop, as well as extensive information that isn't true at all about alcohol, but that is presented as true. Then, after sitting through the seven hour video, the clerk gives him an additional pamphlet that he has to read with more information. At that time, he will have to go to at least two AA meetings and listen to the various participants offer their testimony about the evils of alcohol and how alcohol ruined their lives. Once he gets back from the meetings, the clerk will gladly sell him his beer, but he has to wait 72 hours before taking possession of it, just to be sure he doesn't change his mind.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,356 posts)
3. can that be made a special Justice Boof-only law?
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 02:59 PM
Feb 2019

Beer Brett should have to go through the sequence you describe every time he wants an adult beverage.

The GOP has targeted voters with surgical precision, so there is precedent for targeting Justice Boof.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. Justice Boof does have a personal record of irresponsible alcohol consumption
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:11 PM
Feb 2019

Unlike the non-existent women who use abortion for birth control, Justice Boof has a personal history of irresponsible use of alcohol. So I can't imagine that he would find any of these common-sense measures to be an unconstitutional hurdle to Boof's exercise of his rights under the 21st Amendment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Supreme Court blocks...