Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why dosen't Congress get rid of this shitshow format? (Original Post) LakeSuperiorView Feb 2019 OP
Congressional hearings are useless in the tv age theboss Feb 2019 #1
Also since the objective is never to actually learn anything, but rather to score partisan points... theboss Feb 2019 #2
Which aren't very impressive, tbh. Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #4
Wouldn't the same apply to Kamala Harris? brooklynite Feb 2019 #5
That's a good point theboss Feb 2019 #6
and replace it with what? nt msongs Feb 2019 #3
Anything. The hearing was a waste of time. LakeSuperiorView Feb 2019 #7
I think there are a few ways to do this theboss Feb 2019 #8
 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
1. Congressional hearings are useless in the tv age
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:25 PM
Feb 2019

I honestly think there have been two meaningful moments in them since tv's invention:

1. McCarthy's "Have you no sense of decency" moment and
2. The revelation of the White House taping system during Watergate.

So, they've produced two meaningful moments since 1950 and the last one was in 1973, before I was born.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
2. Also since the objective is never to actually learn anything, but rather to score partisan points...
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:30 PM
Feb 2019

Both sides are wedded to this format.

Look, I like the guy, but Cory Booker is trying to run for the presidency based on his 5 minute performance pieces in committee meetings.

 

Fuzzpope

(602 posts)
4. Which aren't very impressive, tbh.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:38 PM
Feb 2019

Booker does nothing for me at all.

Also, he makes his eyes open too big, it makes him look like a sweet pickle.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
6. That's a good point
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:43 PM
Feb 2019

I honestly didn't think of her, because she was so damn good the Kavanaugh hearing. It was a performance within an awful lot of competency.

Booker - to me - seems to be doing some kind "Truth to Power" schtick which is almost nothing but performance.

I'm a bit in love with Harris.

 

LakeSuperiorView

(1,533 posts)
7. Anything. The hearing was a waste of time.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:44 PM
Feb 2019

Dems ask Yes/No questions and get rambling nonanswers, Repubs ask irrelevant questions to give him a break. Flip the House and flip the above. It doesn't work.

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
8. I think there are a few ways to do this
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 05:09 PM
Feb 2019

1. Put a limit to how much of this can be on tv. We can tape it and play the transcripts later in order to have transparency. Nerds like me will listen. But it won't be pro-wrestling on CSPAN.

2. Designate one questioner from each side and give them each 30 minute questioning periods. Make these people work if they want to grandstand.

I think it combining those two ideas we might, you know, learn shit about our government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why dosen't Congress get ...