General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo other conservatives out there agree with National Review's "Real Men Don't Have Daughters" idea?
I think it's worth asking, it's a major vein of conservative thought, so do conservative icons and legislators agree with National Review when it says "Real Men Don't Have Daughters"?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Or is NR coming out in favor of abortion for gender selection purposes?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Is this because Obama has daughters? Huh? It's pretty random . . .
Odd
(Signed, a mom of two daughters, with a husband whom I believe is a 'real man')
ck4829
(35,096 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)I am going out on a limb and guessing that Republicans and Democrats have the same general ratio of sons to daughters.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)life. Remember fellas behind every great man is a woman pushing him to be great. Damn give her credit. But then again why in the hell would any woman want to be with thinkers like that if it is true.
ck4829
(35,096 posts)Cover article of their latest edition.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)they do in some foreign countries? Just wondering. I would love to know what kind of mothers gave birth to this cancerous idiots.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Two daughters. No sons.
Same goes for LBJ and Nixon. Two daughters each.
broiles
(1,370 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)sure he didn't go. He is nothing more then a chicken hawk.
lame54
(35,343 posts)None of them are willing to fight in the wars that you're party is so willing to wage
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Sounds like the idiotic ramblings of a right wing fool paid to fill a page with misogynist/bigoted anti Obama baloney channeling the mideval ages probably due to watching too many reruns of game of thrones.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)is about as old as the discovery that the really fun boinky thing Ugg did with Ooma was what made her belly swell up. Since (R)s get most of their sex ed from that era anyway, this sort of came along for the ride.
ismnotwasm
(42,022 posts)I don't know but it explains why they want to treat women as automatic fetus incubators.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Raygun had 3 daughters, Glen Beck has a couple, and Paul Ryan has one as well. Is anyone repuke going to suggest that they aren't "real men"?
That's going to be a tough argument to make, since many conservatives have daughters.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)how to have a boy..how to have a girl..
from a cursory reading, MORE sex, seems to favor having a girl..and invoilves sweets & chocolate
..............................
and the more science-y article
http://www.science20.com/news_releases/chromosomes_are_so_20th_century_male_genes_really_determine_baby_gender_says_study
Chromosomes Are So 20th Century - Male Genes Really Determine Baby Gender, Says Study
By News Staff | December 14th 2008 01:00 AM | Print | E-mail | Track
Men determine the sex of a baby depending on whether their sperm is carrying an X or Y chromosome. An X chromosome combines with the mother's X chromosome to make a baby girl (XX) and a Y chromosome will combine with the mother's to make a boy (XY).
A Newcastle University study suggests that an as-yet undiscovered gene controls whether a man's sperm contains more X or more Y chromosomes, which affects the sex of his children. On a larger scale, the number of men with more X sperm compared to the number of men with more Y sperm affects the sex ratio of children born each year
snip
Tikki
(14,560 posts)I've always wondered if I might have been a good mother to a daughter.
what she might have looked like,
I, also, had no sisters.
Sons Rock but so do Daughters.
The Tikkis