Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,972 posts)
Mon Apr 1, 2019, 09:43 PM Apr 2019

The White House whistleblower bombshell, and what it could mean

It wasn’t that long ago that Donald Trump ran for president making the case that Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state represented a grave national security threat and made her unfit for office.

Evidence is now mounting that he and his White House have taken plenty of their own shortcuts, with the kind of dire implications Trump warned about. And now a key figure is stepping forward to blow the whistle on it.

The Post’s Rachael Bade reports on a new White House whistleblower who alleges that the Trump administration has awarded 25 security clearances to people who had been denied those clearances by national security officials.

Tricia Newbold has served 18 years in the security clearance process, in both Democratic and Republican administrations. She says the denials had been issued for reasons including concerns about potential blackmail, foreign influence, conflicts of interest, questionable or criminal conduct, financial issues and drug abuse. That’s a range of denials that covers pretty much all the major reasons one might not get cleared. She alleges that the administration has looked past all of them. She even says she was told not to raise concerns and retaliated against when she did, by being demoted.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-white-house-whistleblower-bombshell-and-what-it-could-mean/ar-BBVv3AH?li=BBnb7Kz

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The White House whistleblower bombshell, and what it could mean (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2019 OP
is it my imagination, or are women more likely to blow the whistle? mopinko Apr 2019 #1
On CBS national news tonight, Corgigal Apr 2019 #2
Next up: the death threats Takket Apr 2019 #3
yeah, what idiots. limbaugh will repeat it and fill in some more detail tomorrow certainot Apr 2019 #5
since she's been named certainot Apr 2019 #4
k and r...Thank You for posting this. Stuart G Apr 2019 #6

mopinko

(70,103 posts)
1. is it my imagination, or are women more likely to blow the whistle?
Mon Apr 1, 2019, 10:14 PM
Apr 2019

is that why they keep blocking the door to women?
let's elect more, then.


(imho, the answer is- marginalized people are more likely to blow the whistle for a lot of reasons. lesson- dont marginalize people, and try not to break so many fucking rules.)

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
2. On CBS national news tonight,
Mon Apr 1, 2019, 10:26 PM
Apr 2019

they mentioned how this lady lives outside of Baltimore and showed the front of her house.

I was like, Holy shit, why are they doing this? I hope she's ok, she's courageous.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
4. since she's been named
Mon Apr 1, 2019, 11:59 PM
Apr 2019

limbaugh likely will use his subtle way to threaten her and her family because they will need to discourage others from joining and legitimizing it. as in the past, like he did with christine blasey ford and many others, he could do it by casually slipping some family information into his discussion

and we let 88 universities support 260 of the stations he blows from

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The White House whistlebl...