Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLightly redacted?
No such thing if what's redacted is what we must see.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 661 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lightly redacted? (Original Post)
SHRED
Apr 2019
OP
Wounded Bear
(58,653 posts)1. Yep!
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)2. That's Barr speak for 59% of the report redacted
JoeOtterbein
(7,700 posts)3. And highly deleted. Don't forget the 700 pages is now 400. n/t
SHRED
(28,136 posts)5. Was it 700?
I missed that.
JoeOtterbein
(7,700 posts)6. The first reports I saw said 700 pages, then it was 400. n/t
kentuck
(111,094 posts)4. They are already spinning...
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)8. The short explanation
"Whatever we don't want to expose to light will be redacted."